Richard T. Busing

2.6k total citations
50 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Richard T. Busing is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard T. Busing has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 35 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 8 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Richard T. Busing's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (32 papers), Forest ecology and management (27 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (20 papers). Richard T. Busing is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (32 papers), Forest ecology and management (27 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (20 papers). Richard T. Busing collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. Richard T. Busing's co-authors include Nicholas Brokaw, Peter S. White, Edward E. C. Clebsch, Mark D. Mackenzie, Daniel Mailly, Takao Fujimori, P. S. White, Allen M. Solomon, Steven L. Garman and Connie A. Burdick and has published in prestigious journals such as Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Ecology and Journal of Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Richard T. Busing

50 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard T. Busing United States 27 1.5k 1.1k 496 434 392 50 2.0k
John L. Vankat United States 22 1.4k 0.9× 719 0.7× 838 1.7× 287 0.7× 484 1.2× 45 2.0k
Kerry D. Woods United States 19 1.1k 0.7× 810 0.8× 554 1.1× 346 0.8× 265 0.7× 31 1.7k
W. Jan A. Volney Canada 22 1.0k 0.7× 1.4k 1.3× 991 2.0× 1.0k 2.3× 404 1.0× 54 2.4k
Paul B. Alaback United States 19 921 0.6× 545 0.5× 743 1.5× 240 0.6× 322 0.8× 29 1.5k
Margaret R. Metz United States 19 1.2k 0.8× 1.2k 1.1× 825 1.7× 207 0.5× 465 1.2× 37 2.2k
Dylan Keon United States 7 816 0.5× 694 0.6× 731 1.5× 181 0.4× 385 1.0× 12 1.7k
Henrique Eduardo Mendonça Nascimento Brazil 25 2.1k 1.3× 1.4k 1.3× 676 1.4× 207 0.5× 916 2.3× 53 2.9k
Abel Monteagudo United Kingdom 17 1.7k 1.1× 1.2k 1.1× 432 0.9× 203 0.5× 457 1.2× 23 2.3k
Joseph A. Antos Canada 31 1.8k 1.1× 1.1k 1.1× 676 1.4× 550 1.3× 925 2.4× 106 2.7k
M. D. Swaine United Kingdom 17 2.2k 1.4× 986 0.9× 590 1.2× 129 0.3× 798 2.0× 26 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Richard T. Busing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard T. Busing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard T. Busing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard T. Busing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard T. Busing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard T. Busing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard T. Busing. The network helps show where Richard T. Busing may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard T. Busing

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard T. Busing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard T. Busing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard T. Busing. Richard T. Busing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Busing, Richard T., Allen M. Solomon, Robert B. McKane, & Connie A. Burdick. (2007). FOREST DYNAMICS IN OREGON LANDSCAPES: EVALUATION AND APPLICATION OF AN INDIVIDUAL‐BASED MODEL. Ecological Applications. 17(7). 1967–1981. 24 indexed citations
2.
Busing, Richard T.. (2005). TREE MORTALITY, CANOPY TURNOVER, AND WOODY DETRITUS IN OLD COVE FORESTS OF THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS. Ecology. 86(1). 73–84. 53 indexed citations
3.
Busing, Richard T. & Allen M. Solomon. (2004). A Comparison of Forest Survey Data with Forest Dynamics Simulators FORCLIM and ZELIG along Climatic Gradients in the Pacific Northwest. Scientific investigations report. 11 indexed citations
4.
Busing, Richard T.. (2004). Red Spruce Dynamics in an Old Southern Appalachian Forest. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 131(4). 337–337. 14 indexed citations
6.
Busing, Richard T. & Daniel Mailly. (2004). Advances in spatial, individual-based modelling of forest dynamics. Journal of Vegetation Science. 15(6). 831–831. 56 indexed citations
7.
Busing, Richard T. & Steven L. Garman. (2002). Promoting old-growth characteristics and long-term wood production in Douglas-fir forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 160(1-3). 161–175. 47 indexed citations
8.
Busing, Richard T. & Takao Fujimori. (2002). Dynamics of composition and structure in an old Sequoia sempervirens forest. Journal of Vegetation Science. 13(6). 785–792. 27 indexed citations
9.
Brokaw, Nicholas & Richard T. Busing. (2000). Niche versus chance and tree diversity in forest gaps. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 15(5). 183–188. 345 indexed citations
10.
Mailly, Daniel, J. P. Kimmins, & Richard T. Busing. (2000). Disturbance and succession in a coniferous forest of northwestern North America: simulations with dryades, a spatial gap model. Ecological Modelling. 127(2-3). 183–205. 32 indexed citations
11.
Wu, X. Ben, J. McCormick, & Richard T. Busing. (1999). Growth pattern of Picea rubens prior to canopy recruitment. Plant Ecology. 140(2). 245–253. 26 indexed citations
12.
Busing, Richard T., et al.. (1996). Overstory mortality as an indicator of forest health in California. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 42(3). 285–295. 4 indexed citations
13.
Busing, Richard T.. (1996). Estimation of tree replacement patterns in an AppalachianPicea‐Abiesforest. Journal of Vegetation Science. 7(5). 685–694. 43 indexed citations
14.
Busing, Richard T., Charles B. Halpern, & Thomas A. Spies. (1995). Ecology of Pacific Yew ( Taxus brevifolia ) in Western Oregon and Washington. Conservation Biology. 9(5). 1199–1207. 26 indexed citations
15.
Busing, Richard T., et al.. (1993). Gradient analysis of old spruce – fir forests of the Great Smoky Mountains circa 1935. Canadian Journal of Botany. 71(7). 951–958. 54 indexed citations
16.
Busing, Richard T. & Edward E. C. Clebsch. (1987). Application of a spruce-fir forest canopy gap model. Forest Ecology and Management. 20(1-2). 151–169. 21 indexed citations
17.
White, Peter S., Mark D. Mackenzie, Richard T. Busing, et al.. (1985). What's New in Forest Research. The Forestry Chronicle. 61(3). 279–281. 1 indexed citations
18.
White, Peter S., Mark D. Mackenzie, & Richard T. Busing. (1985). Natural disturbance and gap phase dynamics in southern Appalachian spruce–fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 15(1). 233–240. 124 indexed citations
19.
White, Peter S., Mark D. Mackenzie, & Richard T. Busing. (1985). A critique on overstory/understory comparisons based on transition probability analysis of an old growth spruce-fir stand in the Appalachians. Plant Ecology. 64(1). 37–45. 39 indexed citations
20.
Busing, Richard T. & Edward E. C. Clebsch. (1983). Species Composition and Species Richness in First-Year Old Fields: Responses to Season of Soil Distrubance. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 110(3). 304–304. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026