Richard Stoll
- Oral Surgery top 2%
- Orthodontics top 5%
- Periodontics top 2%
- General Dentistry top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Vitus StachnissAnahita Jablonski‐MomeniKlaus PieperMonika Heinzel‐GutenbrunnerLing YinAbdur-Rasheed AlaoXiaofei SongYasuhiro HOTTA
- Topics
- Dental materials and restorations (8 papers)Dental Research and COVID-19 (8 papers)Dental Radiography and Imaging (8 papers)
In The Last Decade
Richard Stoll
21 papers receiving 443 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Oral Surgery 271
- Orthodontics 191
- Periodontics 172
- General Dentistry 86
- Biomedical Engineering 72
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Stoll
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Stoll more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Stoll
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Stoll. The network helps show where Richard Stoll may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Stoll
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Stoll. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Stoll based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Stoll. Richard Stoll is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 43 | |
| 4 | 84 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | 3 |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | Cutaneous sinus tract of endodontic origin: a case report | 2 |
| 15 | Theory and practice of tooth color for the restorative therapy | 0 |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | The disinfecting effect of ozonized oxygen in an infected root canal: an in vitro study. | 11 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 86 | |
| 20 | The New RCRA Cleanup Regime: Comparisons and Contrasts with CERCLA | 3 |
About Richard Stoll
Richard Stoll is a scholar working on General Dentistry, Orthodontics and Oral Surgery, having authored 22 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dental materials and restorations (8 papers), Dental Research and COVID-19 (8 papers) and Dental Radiography and Imaging (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Dentistry (86 citations), Orthodontics (191 citations) and Oral Surgery (271 citations). Richard Stoll has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Vitus Stachniss, Anahita Jablonski‐Momeni, Klaus Pieper, Monika Heinzel‐Gutenbrunner, Ling Yin, Abdur-Rasheed Alao, Xiaofei Song, Yasuhiro HOTTA, Yo Shibata and Takashi Miyazaki. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Materials Science, Journal of Endodontics and Dental Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.