Richard Steiner

1.3k citations
46 papers · 915 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Richard Steiner

44 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers

Richard Steiner
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 65
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 11
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 70
  • General Health Professions 213
  • Pharmacy 37
Replace Shu‐Chuan Chang with:
Shu‐Chuan Chang Taiwan
Graeme D Smith United Kingdom
Isabelle Gaboury Canada
Milad Borji Iran
Philip Keeley United Kingdom
Mollie Gilchrist United Kingdom
Mehtap Tan Türkiye
Lena Mårtensson Sweden
Sofia Zyga Greece
Steven Ersser United Kingdom
Richard Steiner relative to Shu‐Chuan Chang Taiwan Shu‐Chuan Chang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Shu‐Chuan Chang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Steiner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Steiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Steiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Steiner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Steiner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Steiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Steiner. The network helps show where Richard Steiner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Steiner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Steiner Line = papers co-authored together Richard Steiner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009101
2 198199
3 200684
4 199460
5 200449
6 200149
7
Folk medicine : the art and the science
198644
8 200035
9 197934
10 200031
11 200929
12 198529
13 198523
14 201823
15 200822
16 199020
17 200319
18 201217
19 200716
20 201312

About Richard Steiner

Richard Steiner is a scholar working on Surgery, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology and Rheumatology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 915 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urinary Tract Infections Management (4 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (4 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (3 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (65 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (11 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (70 citations), General Health Professions (213 citations) and Pharmacy (37 citations). Richard Steiner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Katharine Kolcaba, Lois M. Verbrugge, Thérèse Dowd, Victoria Schirm, Min Xu, Susan N. Kushner Benson, N. Margaret Wineman, Melanie A. Morscher, Patrick Riley and Alan J. Lerner. Their work appears in journals such as Holistic Nursing Practice, Spine Deformity, Brain and Cognition, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact