Richard S. Fee

963 total citations
7 papers, 872 citations indexed

About

Richard S. Fee is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Electrochemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard S. Fee has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 872 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 5 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and 3 papers in Electrochemistry. Recurrent topics in Richard S. Fee's work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (5 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (5 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (3 papers). Richard S. Fee is often cited by papers focused on Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (5 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (5 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (3 papers). Richard S. Fee collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Richard S. Fee's co-authors include Mark Maroncelli, Curtis F. Chapman, Ranko Richert, F. Stickel, Siobhan M. Miick, David P. Millar, Walter Chazin, John A. Milsom and Graham R. Fleming and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics Letters.

In The Last Decade

Richard S. Fee

7 papers receiving 855 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard S. Fee United States 7 592 444 240 238 161 7 872
Tai Jong Kang South Korea 15 896 1.5× 751 1.7× 300 1.3× 129 0.5× 236 1.5× 27 1.1k
Michael A. Kahlow United States 11 745 1.3× 659 1.5× 249 1.0× 264 1.1× 180 1.1× 14 1.1k
Włodzimierz Jarzęba United States 16 1.1k 1.8× 904 2.0× 366 1.5× 153 0.6× 290 1.8× 25 1.4k
H. Heitele Germany 19 992 1.7× 485 1.1× 277 1.2× 254 1.1× 630 3.9× 24 1.4k
Andrew A. Jaye United Kingdom 11 217 0.4× 263 0.6× 70 0.3× 207 0.9× 101 0.6× 12 594
L. D. Zusman United States 11 710 1.2× 703 1.6× 120 0.5× 144 0.6× 139 0.9× 20 1.1k
Kimihiko Hara Japan 17 501 0.8× 421 0.9× 299 1.2× 95 0.4× 198 1.2× 53 742
Mohsen Sajadi Germany 18 291 0.5× 553 1.2× 100 0.4× 123 0.5× 183 1.1× 30 938
Thorsten Koslowski Germany 18 145 0.2× 245 0.6× 89 0.4× 339 1.4× 224 1.4× 90 1000
B. Venkataraman India 15 488 0.8× 348 0.8× 235 1.0× 113 0.5× 231 1.4× 35 920

Countries citing papers authored by Richard S. Fee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard S. Fee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard S. Fee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard S. Fee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard S. Fee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard S. Fee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard S. Fee. The network helps show where Richard S. Fee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard S. Fee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard S. Fee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard S. Fee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard S. Fee. Richard S. Fee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Miick, Siobhan M., Richard S. Fee, David P. Millar, & Walter Chazin. (1997). Crossover isomer bias is the primary sequence-dependent property of immobilized Holliday junctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 94(17). 9080–9084. 88 indexed citations
2.
Chapman, Curtis F., Richard S. Fee, & Mark Maroncelli. (1995). Measurements of the Solute Dependence of Solvation Dynamics in 1-Propanol: The Role of Specific Hydrogen-Bonding Interactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 99(13). 4811–4819. 151 indexed citations
3.
Richert, Ranko, F. Stickel, Richard S. Fee, & Mark Maroncelli. (1994). Solvation dynamics and the dielectric response in a glass-forming solvent: from picoseconds to seconds. Chemical Physics Letters. 229(3). 302–308. 99 indexed citations
4.
Fee, Richard S. & Mark Maroncelli. (1994). Estimating the time-zero spectrum in time-resolved emmsion measurements of solvation dynamics. Chemical Physics. 183(2-3). 235–247. 365 indexed citations
5.
Maroncelli, Mark, Richard S. Fee, Curtis F. Chapman, & Graham R. Fleming. (1991). Comment on "dynamic Stokes shift in coumarin: is it only relaxation?". The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 95(2). 1012–1014. 44 indexed citations
6.
Fee, Richard S., John A. Milsom, & Mark Maroncelli. (1991). Inhomogeneous decay kinetics and apparent solvent relaxation at low temperatures. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 95(13). 5170–5181. 65 indexed citations
7.
Chapman, Curtis F., Richard S. Fee, & Mark Maroncelli. (1990). Solvation dynamics in N-methylamides. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 94(12). 4929–4935. 60 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026