This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Pipes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Pipes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Pipes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Pipes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Pipes. The network helps show where Richard Pipes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Pipes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Pipes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Pipes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Pipes. Richard Pipes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Riasanovsky, Nicholas V. & Richard Pipes. (1976). Russia under the Old Regime. The Russian Review. 35(1). 103–103.89 indexed citations
16.
Pipes, Richard. (1963). Les relations diplomatiques du gouvernement Wrangel en Crimée, 1920. Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche).1 indexed citations
17.
Petrovich, Michael B. & Richard Pipes. (1962). The Russian Intelligentsia. The American Historical Review. 67(3). 722–722.2 indexed citations
Pipes, Richard. (1958). Demographic and ethnographic changes in Transcaucasia, 1897-1956. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.