Richard N. Gates

863 total citations
29 papers, 617 citations indexed

About

Richard N. Gates is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard N. Gates has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 617 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Surgery, 12 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 12 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Richard N. Gates's work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (12 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (12 papers) and Congenital Heart Disease Studies (10 papers). Richard N. Gates is often cited by papers focused on Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (12 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (12 papers) and Congenital Heart Disease Studies (10 papers). Richard N. Gates collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Mongolia. Richard N. Gates's co-authors include Hillel Laks, Davis C. Drinkwater, Jeffrey M. Pearl, Paul Lo Gerfo, Paul Chang, A. Ardehali, Alon S. Aharon, Beth A. Parker, Ehud Rudis and Peter Grant and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Richard N. Gates

29 papers receiving 585 citations

Peers

Richard N. Gates
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Surgery 378
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 220
  • Epidemiology 195
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 186
  • Biomedical Engineering 157
Replace Nadiv Shapira with:
Nadiv Shapira United States
Ulf Abdel‐Rahman Germany
Miguel Tamariz Canada
Mark A. Groh United States
Robert M. Bojar United States
Rıza Türköz Türkiye
Gregory S. Matte United States
Yoshito Kawachi Japan
A Knight United States
Jeri Sever Canada
Nadiv Shapira United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Richard N. Gates
Richard N. Gates · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Richard N. Gates
Richard N. Gates · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Richard N. Gates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard N. Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard N. Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard N. Gates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard N. Gates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard N. Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard N. Gates. The network helps show where Richard N. Gates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard N. Gates

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard N. Gates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard N. Gates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard N. Gates. Richard N. Gates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 28
3 5
4 1
5 28
6 23
7 1
8 5
9 8
10 11
11 19
12 17
13 18
14 14
15 50
16 21
17 21
18
Leukocyte-depleted reperfusion of transplanted human hearts: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
69
19 20
20 98

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026