Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Accounting and the examination: A genealogy of disciplinary power
1986556 citationsKeith Hoskin, Richard Macveprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Macve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Macve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Macve more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Macve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Macve. The network helps show where Richard Macve may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Macve
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Macve.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Macve based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Macve. Richard Macve is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Macve, Richard. (2021). In memory of Basil Selig Yamey, 1919–2020. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 31(1). 121–123.
Macve, Richard, et al.. (2019). Some Theoretical Implications of New Discoveries in Chinese Accounting History Research from Original Archival Materials. SSRN Electronic Journal.
8.
Macve, Richard. (2015). The Future Structure of the Global Accounting and Auditing Profession: Western and Chinese Perspectives.2 indexed citations
Bromwich, Michael, Richard Macve, & Shyam Sunder. (2005). FASB/IASB Revisiting the Concepts: a comment on Hicks and the concept of ‘income’ in the conceptual framework.18 indexed citations
14.
Macve, Richard. (2002). Insights to be Gained from the Study of Ancient Accounting History: Some Reflections on the New Edition of Finley's the Ancient Economy. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
Gwilliam, David & Richard Macve. (1993). A Survey of Lloyd's Syndicate Accounts: Issues in Financial Reporting at Lloyd's. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
17.
Macve, Richard, et al.. (1992). Business, accountancy and the environment : a policy and research agenda. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).44 indexed citations
Macve, Richard & Jonathan Jackson. (1991). Marking to Market: Accounting for Marketable Securities in the Financial Services Industry. Medical Entomology and Zoology.12 indexed citations
20.
Macve, Richard. (1981). A conceptual framework for financial accounting and reporting : the possibilities for an agreed structure : a report prepared at the request of the Accounting Standards Committee.30 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.