Richard M. Williams

1.6k citations
37 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 18

Richard M. Williams

34 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Richard M. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 493
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 333
  • Spectroscopy 317
  • Materials Chemistry 311
  • Atmospheric Science 253
Replace R. S. Disselkamp with:
R. S. Disselkamp United States
G. Restelli Italy
Takeshi Tominaga Japan
M. L. Mandich United States
Sven Krüger Germany
A. Burneau France
Douglas C. Duckworth United States
R.M. Williams United States
Qiuhan Lin China
Péter Szabó Hungary
Richard M. Williams relative to R. S. Disselkamp United States R. S. Disselkamp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
R. S. Disselkamp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. Williams. The network helps show where Richard M. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard M. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard M. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard M. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard M. Williams. Richard M. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 0
3 9
4
Improved Calibration and Operation of a Stable-Gas Quantification Manifold as Part of a Radioxenon Collection System
0
5 93
6 3
7
Rapid scan (Doppler-limited) absorption spectroscopy using mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers
1
8
Spectral and modulation performance of quantum cascade lasers with application to remote sensing
1
9 25
10 36
11 46
12 15
13 6
14 20
15 12
16 129
17 6
18 20
19
International Education: A Political Action.
0
20 6

About Richard M. Williams

Richard M. Williams is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Structural Biology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (11 papers), Laser Design and Applications (6 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (84 citations), Spectroscopy (317 citations) and Atmospheric Science (253 citations). Richard M. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Richard S. Crandall, Stephen R. Leone, Allen Bloom, Matthew S. Taubman, F. Sánchez‐Sinencio, John M. Papanikolas, Bret D. Cannon, Tanya L. Myers, Claire Gmachl and Alfred Y. Cho. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Environmental Science & Technology and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026