Richard M. Piech

17 total papers · 429 total citations
13 papers, 312 citations indexed

About

Richard M. Piech is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard M. Piech has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 312 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Richard M. Piech's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers). Richard M. Piech is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers). Richard M. Piech collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Richard M. Piech's co-authors include David H. Zald, John A. Parkinson, Maureen McHugo, Angela Roberts, Adrian M. Owen, Paul E. Downing, Stephen D. Smith, J. van der Meer, Caroline H. Parkinson and Bassel Abou‐Khalil and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Neuropsychologia.

In The Last Decade

Richard M. Piech

13 papers receiving 304 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Richard M. Piech 163 90 79 58 48 13 312
Rafaela R. Campagnoli 163 1.0× 142 1.6× 67 0.8× 25 0.4× 86 1.8× 17 333
Deb Vansteenwegen 196 1.2× 149 1.7× 60 0.8× 60 1.0× 94 2.0× 12 342
Arun D’Souza 148 0.9× 59 0.7× 81 1.0× 70 1.2× 25 0.5× 8 318
David García‐Burgos 49 0.3× 49 0.5× 75 0.9× 113 1.9× 45 0.9× 28 312
Aleksandra Mroczko-Wąsowicz 203 1.2× 182 2.0× 23 0.3× 111 1.9× 88 1.8× 12 363
Matthias Hoenen 102 0.6× 63 0.7× 18 0.2× 103 1.8× 115 2.4× 16 271
Marion Clepce 60 0.4× 50 0.6× 25 0.3× 106 1.8× 29 0.6× 14 322
Daniel B. LeGoff 184 1.1× 24 0.3× 211 2.7× 28 0.5× 10 0.2× 13 348
Eamon P. Fulcher 165 1.0× 166 1.8× 63 0.8× 34 0.6× 105 2.2× 19 366
Oh‐Ryeong Ha 60 0.4× 32 0.4× 95 1.2× 25 0.4× 29 0.6× 16 270

Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. Piech

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. Piech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. Piech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. Piech more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. Piech

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. Piech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. Piech. The network helps show where Richard M. Piech may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard M. Piech

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard M. Piech. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard M. Piech based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard M. Piech. Richard M. Piech is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026