Richard M. Pearson

57 total papers · 404 total citations
34 papers, 263 citations indexed

About

Richard M. Pearson is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard M. Pearson has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 263 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 10 papers in Epidemiology and 9 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Richard M. Pearson's work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (13 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (8 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (8 papers). Richard M. Pearson is often cited by papers focused on Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (13 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (8 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (8 papers). Richard M. Pearson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Richard M. Pearson's co-authors include Mark S. Soloway, Peter D. White, Bruce Kidd, Bruce J. W. Evans and Nathan Efron and has published in prestigious journals such as Urology, Survey of Ophthalmology and Optometry and Vision Science.

In The Last Decade

Richard M. Pearson

26 papers receiving 232 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Richard M. Pearson 100 72 46 35 29 34 263
Sheng Qiu 71 0.7× 13 0.2× 54 1.2× 27 0.8× 6 0.2× 30 297
Shan Yang 25 0.3× 33 0.5× 63 1.4× 24 0.7× 21 0.7× 37 280
Ren Liu 30 0.3× 46 0.6× 70 1.5× 58 1.7× 14 0.5× 30 328
Jiaqi Liu 36 0.4× 15 0.2× 61 1.3× 13 0.4× 9 0.3× 35 324
Noriko Hiramatsu 22 0.2× 34 0.5× 40 0.9× 61 1.7× 7 0.2× 37 329
Fang Han 25 0.3× 37 0.5× 31 0.7× 22 0.6× 15 0.5× 26 277
Nadim S. Azar 32 0.3× 22 0.3× 25 0.5× 25 0.7× 44 1.5× 22 206
Vikram Brar 68 0.7× 93 1.3× 15 0.3× 144 4.1× 6 0.2× 17 275
Hamid Alemi 58 0.6× 53 0.7× 22 0.5× 24 0.7× 5 0.2× 24 213
Joseph Pizzimenti 32 0.3× 69 1.0× 19 0.4× 121 3.5× 60 2.1× 26 299

Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. Pearson. The network helps show where Richard M. Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard M. Pearson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard M. Pearson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard M. Pearson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard M. Pearson. Richard M. Pearson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026