Richard M. Heath
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Surgery top 1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- P J GuillouDavid JayneJulia BrownPhilip QuirkeAdrian SmithH. ThorpeJoanne M. WalkerJoanne Copeland
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (6 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers)Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Richard M. Heath
13 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Oncology 3.4k
- Surgery 2.5k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.0k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 512
- Biomedical Engineering 135
Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. Heath
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. Heath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. Heath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. Heath more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. Heath
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. Heath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. Heath. The network helps show where Richard M. Heath may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard M. Heath
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard M. Heath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard M. Heath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard M. Heath. Richard M. Heath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 74 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Groupbreakdown → | 1108 |
| 10 | Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trialbreakdown → | 2340 |
| 11 | 56 | |
| 12 | Melanoma metastatic to the gastrointestinal tract. | 5 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 |
About Richard M. Heath
Richard M. Heath is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Microbiology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers) and Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (3.4k citations), Surgery (2.5k citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.0k citations). Richard M. Heath has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include P J Guillou, David Jayne, Julia Brown, Philip Quirke, Adrian Smith, H. Thorpe, Joanne M. Walker, Joanne Copeland, Heman Joshi and Paul Rooney. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Gut.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.