Richard M. Flowerdew
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Surgery
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- James F. MayhewL. Reuven PasternakJames F. ArensRobert A. CaplanBarbara GoldRichard T. ConnisLee A. FleisherLinda Jo Rice
- Topics
- Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers)Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Richard M. Flowerdew
7 papers receiving 426 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 303
- Surgery 258
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 79
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 77
- General Health Professions 47
Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. Flowerdew
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. Flowerdew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. Flowerdew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. Flowerdew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. Flowerdew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. Flowerdew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. Flowerdew. The network helps show where Richard M. Flowerdew may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard M. Flowerdew
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard M. Flowerdew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard M. Flowerdew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard M. Flowerdew. Richard M. Flowerdew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Practice Advisory for Preanesthesia Evaluationbreakdown → | 424 |
| 2 | Methods in Human Geography: a guide for students doing a research project Second Edition | 14 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 0 |
About Richard M. Flowerdew
Richard M. Flowerdew is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Medical Laboratory Technology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (79 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (303 citations) and Surgery (258 citations). Richard M. Flowerdew has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James F. Mayhew, L. Reuven Pasternak, James F. Arens, Robert A. Caplan, Barbara Gold, Richard T. Connis, Lee A. Fleisher, Linda Jo Rice and Deborah Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Anaesthesia and Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.