Richard L. Hawks
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Toxicology top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Organic Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Gene BarnettRichard B. ResnickIrwin J. KopinNguyen B. ThoaR. W. ColburnC. Nora ChiangPeter W. JeffsDavid Farrier
- Topics
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (4 papers)Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (4 papers)Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyThe Journal of Organic ChemistryJournal of Ethnopharmacology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Richard L. Hawks
15 papers receiving 542 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Pharmacology 210
- Toxicology 183
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 169
- Clinical Psychology 118
- Organic Chemistry 71
Countries citing papers authored by Richard L. Hawks
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard L. Hawks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard L. Hawks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard L. Hawks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard L. Hawks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard L. Hawks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard L. Hawks. The network helps show where Richard L. Hawks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard L. Hawks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard L. Hawks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard L. Hawks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard L. Hawks. Richard L. Hawks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | Quantitative versus qualitative urinalysis for benzoylecgonine in clinical trials for the assessment of cocaine use. | 10 |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | Urine Testing for Drugs of Abuse. NIDA Research Monograph Series 73. | 34 |
| 8 | 100 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 133 | |
| 11 | 113 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 28 |
About Richard L. Hawks
Richard L. Hawks is a scholar working on Toxicology, Pharmacology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 15 papers that have together received 579 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (4 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (4 papers) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (183 citations), Pharmacology (210 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (169 citations). Richard L. Hawks has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gene Barnett, Richard B. Resnick, Irwin J. Kopin, Nguyen B. Thoa, R. W. Colburn, C. Nora Chiang, Peter W. Jeffs, David Farrier, Howard A. Gross and Vivian B. Faden. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Journal of Ethnopharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.