Richard Kozul‐Wright

19 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Richard Kozul‐Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Economics and Econometrics 177
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 139
  • Political Science and International Relations 124
  • Strategy and Management 117
  • Sociology and Political Science 80
Replace Warrick Smith with:
Warrick Smith
Deborah Elms Thailand
Louise Curran France
Helena Schweiger United Kingdom
Patrício Meller Chile
Neil Foster‐McGregor Netherlands
Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall Sweden
Paola Conconi Belgium
Ekaterina Vostroknutova Netherlands
Edmund Amann United Kingdom
Richard Kozul‐Wright relative to Warrick Smith Warrick Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Warrick Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Kozul‐Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Kozul‐Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Kozul‐Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Kozul‐Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Kozul‐Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Kozul‐Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Kozul‐Wright. The network helps show where Richard Kozul‐Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Kozul‐Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Kozul‐Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Kozul‐Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Kozul‐Wright. Richard Kozul‐Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 4
4 1
5 4
6 2
7 16
8 42
9 3
10
Economic insecurity and development
3
11
The Resistible Rise of Market Fundamentalism: Rethinking Development Policy in an Unbalanced World
11
12 11
13 1
14 62
15 54
16 40
17 3
18 16
19
UNCTAD Secretariat report to the Conference on East Asian Development : Lessons for a New Global Environment : Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 29 February to 1 March 1996
5
20 21

About Richard Kozul‐Wright

Richard Kozul‐Wright is a scholar working on Development, Business and International Management and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 21 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Development and Aid (4 papers), Global trade and economics (4 papers) and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (139 citations), Business and International Management (29 citations) and Development (50 citations). Richard Kozul‐Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include José Manuel Salazar-Xirinachs, Ha‐Joon Chang, Robert Rowthorn, Yılmaz Akyüz, Chantal Line Carpentier, Birgitte Andersen, Thea Riofrancos, Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò and William N. Kring. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Development Studies, Oxford Economic Papers and Oxford Review of Economic Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026