Richard Hosking

93 total papers · 587 total citations
14 papers, 211 citations indexed

About

Richard Hosking is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Hosking has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 211 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 4 papers in Information Systems and 4 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Richard Hosking's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (5 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (3 papers) and Academic Publishing and Open Access (3 papers). Richard Hosking is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (5 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (3 papers) and Academic Publishing and Open Access (3 papers). Richard Hosking collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and Germany. Richard Hosking's co-authors include Lucy Montgomery, Chun‐Kai Huang, Cameron Neylon, Katie Wilson, Amanda Nettelbeck, Sarah A. Jelbert, Alex H. Taylor, Russell D. Gray, Robert Foster and R.N. Handcock and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and eLife.

In The Last Decade

Richard Hosking

14 papers receiving 195 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Richard Hosking 77 51 42 23 22 14 211
Georgina M. Montgomery 23 0.3× 34 0.7× 41 1.0× 31 1.3× 35 1.6× 19 260
Monica Bradford 86 1.1× 27 0.5× 59 1.4× 8 0.3× 3 0.1× 10 192
Julia G. Bottesini 67 0.9× 13 0.3× 21 0.5× 39 1.7× 24 1.1× 9 197
Saurabh Khanna 25 0.3× 33 0.6× 15 0.4× 19 0.8× 5 0.2× 13 216
George D. Gopen 19 0.2× 15 0.3× 10 0.2× 13 0.6× 10 0.5× 15 264
Şebnem Er 8 0.1× 31 0.6× 13 0.3× 36 1.6× 16 0.7× 14 281
Theiss Bendixen 66 0.9× 21 0.4× 26 0.6× 69 3.0× 27 1.2× 21 192
Elizabeth L. Pier 74 1.0× 22 0.4× 14 0.3× 26 1.1× 45 2.0× 13 250
Christopher R. Chartier 35 0.5× 8 0.2× 18 0.4× 84 3.7× 43 2.0× 16 243
Anastasiya Astapova 35 0.5× 80 1.6× 65 1.5× 48 2.1× 10 0.5× 21 232

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Hosking

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Hosking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Hosking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Hosking more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Hosking

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Hosking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Hosking. The network helps show where Richard Hosking may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Hosking

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Hosking. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Hosking based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Hosking. Richard Hosking is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026