Richard H. Drew
- Infectious Diseases top 2%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Harry A. GallisElizabeth D. HermsenRobert C. OwensConan MacDougallRoger L. WhiteMichael J. RybakErika J. ErnstMarisel Segarra‐Newnham
- Topics
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance (7 papers)Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (6 papers)Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (6 papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Infectious DiseasesThe American Journal of MedicineInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaTanzania
In The Last Decade
Richard H. Drew
14 papers receiving 982 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Infectious Diseases 560
- Epidemiology 357
- Molecular Biology 170
- Pharmacology 163
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 150
Countries citing papers authored by Richard H. Drew
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard H. Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard H. Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard H. Drew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard H. Drew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard H. Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard H. Drew. The network helps show where Richard H. Drew may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard H. Drew
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard H. Drew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard H. Drew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard H. Drew. Richard H. Drew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 52 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 62 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Amphotericin B: 30 Years of Clinical Experiencebreakdown → | 824 |
| 19 | 10 |
About Richard H. Drew
Richard H. Drew is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Clinical Biochemistry and Internal Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Use and Resistance (7 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (6 papers) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (150 citations), Infectious Diseases (560 citations) and Small Animals (77 citations). Richard H. Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Tanzania. Frequent co-authors include Harry A. Gallis, Elizabeth D. Hermsen, Robert C. Owens, Conan MacDougall, Roger L. White, Michael J. Rybak, Erika J. Ernst, Marisel Segarra‐Newnham, Michael E. Klepser and John A. Bosso. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, The American Journal of Medicine and Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.