Richard Godijn
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Co-authors
- Jan TheeuwesJay PrattBernhard HommelLorenza S. ColzatoGiel‐Jan de VriesArthur F. KramerArtem V. BelopolskyMieke Donk
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers)Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (4 papers)
- Journals
- Psychological ScienceExperimental Brain ResearchJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Richard Godijn
19 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.6k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 351
- Sensory Systems 190
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 174
- Human-Computer Interaction 166
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Godijn
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Godijn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Godijn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Godijn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Godijn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Godijn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Godijn. The network helps show where Richard Godijn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Godijn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Godijn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Godijn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Godijn. Richard Godijn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 85 | |
| 9 | 55 | |
| 10 | 55 | |
| 11 | 122 | |
| 12 | 106 | |
| 13 | 41 | |
| 14 | 101 | |
| 15 | 70 | |
| 16 | 352 | |
| 17 | 270 | |
| 18 | 327 | |
| 19 | Saccadic target selection during visual search. | 1 |
About Richard Godijn
Richard Godijn is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Sensory Systems, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Sensory Systems (190 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (166 citations). Richard Godijn has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jan Theeuwes, Jay Pratt, Bernhard Hommel, Lorenza S. Colzato, Giel‐Jan de Vries, Arthur F. Kramer, Artem V. Belopolsky, Mieke Donk and Harold Bekkering. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Science, Experimental Brain Research and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.