Richard C. Bollinger

508 total citations
18 papers, 332 citations indexed

About

Richard C. Bollinger is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard C. Bollinger has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 332 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Geometry and Topology, 4 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and 3 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Richard C. Bollinger's work include Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (4 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (3 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (3 papers). Richard C. Bollinger is often cited by papers focused on Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (4 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (3 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (3 papers). Richard C. Bollinger collaborates with scholars based in United States and Sweden. Richard C. Bollinger's co-authors include Anthony A. Salvia, Albert L. Rabenstein, Leo F. Boron and А. В. Погорелов and has published in prestigious journals such as American Mathematical Monthly, IEEE Transactions on Reliability and ˜The œFibonacci quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Richard C. Bollinger

18 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers

Richard C. Bollinger
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 156
  • Statistics and Probability 104
  • Software 63
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 53
  • Applied Mathematics 49
Replace Ourania Chryssaphinou with:
Ourania Chryssaphinou Greece
Zaharias M. Psillakis Greece
Katuomi Hirano Japan
Danny Dyer United States
Kurt Weichselberger Germany
Volker Nollau Germany
Philippe Delsarte Belgium
Catherine Doléans-Dade
G. W. Hill Australia
Yves Romain France
Ourania Chryssaphinou Greece View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Richard C. Bollinger
Richard C. Bollinger · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Richard C. Bollinger
Richard C. Bollinger · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Richard C. Bollinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard C. Bollinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard C. Bollinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard C. Bollinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard C. Bollinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard C. Bollinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard C. Bollinger. The network helps show where Richard C. Bollinger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard C. Bollinger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard C. Bollinger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard C. Bollinger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard C. Bollinger. Richard C. Bollinger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 9
3 5
4 11
5 1
6 7
7 5
8 14
9 19
10 6
11 4
12 3
13 6
14 48
15 77
16 51
17
Monge-Ampere equations of elliptic type
47
18 16

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026