Richard Bubel
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Software top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Co-authors
- Reiner HähnleAndreas RothBernhard BeckertWolfgang AhrendtSteffen SchlagerThomas BaarWojciech MostowskiPeter H. Schmitt
- Topics
- Software Engineering Research (11 papers)Logic, programming, and type systems (11 papers)Formal Methods in Verification (11 papers)
In The Last Decade
Richard Bubel
18 papers receiving 163 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Artificial Intelligence 138
- Software 93
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 68
- Information Systems 61
- Computer Networks and Communications 26
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Bubel
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Bubel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Bubel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Bubel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Bubel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Bubel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Bubel. The network helps show where Richard Bubel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Bubel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Bubel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Bubel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Bubel. Richard Bubel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | Verification of Variable Software: an Experience Report | 2 |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | A Hoare-Style Calculus with Explicit State Updates | 2 |
| 16 | Specification Predicates with Explicit Dependency Information | 0 |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 124 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Richard Bubel
Richard Bubel is a scholar working on Software, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 22 papers that have together received 191 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (11 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (11 papers) and Formal Methods in Verification (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (93 citations), Artificial Intelligence (138 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (68 citations). Richard Bubel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Reiner Hähnle, Andreas Roth, Bernhard Beckert, Wolfgang Ahrendt, Steffen Schlager, Thomas Baar, Wojciech Mostowski, Peter H. Schmitt, Wolfram Menzel and Martin A. Giese. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Security, Lecture notes in computer science and Software & Systems Modeling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.