Countries citing papers authored by Richard Barnes
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Barnes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Barnes. The network helps show where Richard Barnes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Barnes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Barnes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Barnes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Barnes. Richard Barnes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Barnes, Richard, Zakir Durumeric, Peter Eckersley, et al.. (2019). Let's Encrypt. 2473–2487.65 indexed citations
2.
Felt, Adrienne Porter, et al.. (2017). Measuring {HTTPS} Adoption on the Web. USENIX Security Symposium. 1323–1338.70 indexed citations
3.
Langley, Adam, et al.. (2015). Deprecating Secure Sockets Layer Version 3.0. RFC. 7568. 1–7.18 indexed citations
4.
Cox, Elizabeth, Rachel Barry, Stanton A. Glantz, & Richard Barnes. (2014). Tobacco Control in California, 2007-2014: A Resurgent Tobacco Industry While Inflation Erodes the California Tobacco Control Program. eScholarship (California Digital Library).4 indexed citations
Laposata, Elizabeth A., Richard Barnes, & Stanton A. Glantz. (2012). Tobacco Industry Influence on the American Law Institute's Restatements of Torts and Implications for Its Conflict of Interest Policies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 98(1). 1–68.1 indexed citations
7.
Barnes, Richard, et al.. (2011). Chipping Away at Tobacco Traditions in Tobacco Country: Tobacco Industry Political Influence and Tobacco Policy Making in North Carolina 1969-2011. eScholarship (California Digital Library).4 indexed citations
Barnes, Richard, et al.. (2010). The High Cost of Compromise: Tobacco Industry Political Influence and Tobacco Control Policy in Virginia, 1977-2009. eScholarship (California Digital Library).2 indexed citations
11.
Barnes, Richard, et al.. (2010). A Few More Laps to Go: Tobacco Industry Political Influence, Public Health Advocacy and Tobacco Control Policy Making in Indiana. eScholarship (California Digital Library).3 indexed citations
12.
Barnes, Richard, et al.. (2009). Shifting Attitudes Towards Tobacco Control in Tobacco Country: Tobacco Industry Political Influence and Tobacco Policy Making in South Carolina. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
Barnes, Richard, et al.. (2008). Tobacco Control in Hawai'i: Progress in Paradise. eScholarship (California Digital Library).3 indexed citations
15.
Barnes, Richard, et al.. (2008). Tobacco Control in Transition: Public Support and Governmental Disarray in Arizona 1997-2007. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.6 indexed citations
16.
Barnes, Richard, et al.. (2007). Tobacco Control in California 2003-2007: Missed Opportunities. eScholarship (California Digital Library).6 indexed citations
Barnes, Richard. (2002). The Oklahoma Alliance on Health or Tobacco. A partnership for a healthier Oklahoma.. PubMed. 95(3). 126–126.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.