Richard A. Robie
About
In The Last Decade
Richard A. Robie
83 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Geophysics 1.2k
- Materials Chemistry 888
- Biomaterials 432
- Ceramics and Composites 416
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 368
Countries citing papers authored by Richard A. Robie
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard A. Robie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard A. Robie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard A. Robie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard A. Robie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard A. Robie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard A. Robie. The network helps show where Richard A. Robie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard A. Robie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard A. Robie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard A. Robie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard A. Robie. Richard A. Robie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Heat capacity and entropy of bornite (Cu 5 FeS 4 ) between 6 and 760 K and the thermodynamic properties of phases in the system Cu-Fe-S | 14 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Heat capacities and thermodynamic properties of annite (aluminous iron biotite) | 14 |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | Low-temperature heat capacities and derived thermodynamic properties of anthophyllite, diopside, enstatite, bronzite, and wollastonite | 80 |
| 7 | High-temperature heat capacities and derived thermodynamic properties of anthophyllite, diopside, dolomite, enstatite, bronzite, talc, tremolite and wollastonite | 92 |
| 8 | The heat capacities of osumilite from 298.15 to 1000 K, the thermodynamic properties of two natural chlorites to 500 K, and the thermodynamic properties of petalite to 1800 K | 33 |
| 9 | 103 | |
| 10 | The thermodynamic properties of fluor'topaz | 45 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Low-temperature heat capacities and entropies of feldspar glasses and of anorthite | 51 |
| 13 | Enthalpies of formation of low albite (NaAlSi 3 O 8 ), gibbsite (Al(OH) 3 ), and NaAlO 2 ; revised values for Δ H ° f,298 and Δ G ° f,298 of some aluminosilicate minerals | 12 |
| 14 | Specific heats of lunar soils, basalt, and breccias from the Apollo 14, 15, and 16 landing sites, between 90 and 350°K | 52 |
| 15 | Specific Heats of Lunar Basalt, 15555, and Soils 15301 and 60601 from 90 to 350 K | 4 |
| 16 | A calorimetric determination of the standard enthalpies of formation of huntite, CaMg3 (CO3)4 , and artinite, Mg2(OH)2 CO3 * 3H2O, and their standard Gibbs free energies of formation | 9 |
| 17 | The enthalpies of formation of nesquehonite, MgCO3 * 3H2O, and hydromagnesite, 5MgO * 4CO2 * 5H2O | 14 |
| 18 | The Specific Heats of Apollo 14 Soil (14163) and Breccia (14321) Between 90 and 350K | 2 |
| 19 | The Heat Capacities at Low Temperatures and Entropies at 298.15 K of Huntite, CaMg3(CO3)4, and Artinite, Mg2(OH)2CO3-3H20 | 6 |
| 20 | The Heat Capacities at Low-Temperatures and Entropies at 298.15 K of Nesquehonite, MgCO3-3H2O, and Hydromagnesite | 30 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.