Rianne de Wit

2.1k total citations
41 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Rianne de Wit is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Rianne de Wit has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 18 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Rianne de Wit's work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (19 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (15 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers). Rianne de Wit is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Opioid Use (19 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (15 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers). Rianne de Wit collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Taiwan and United States. Rianne de Wit's co-authors include Frits van Dam, Karin van der Heijden, Linda C. Zandbelt, Gerrie Bours, Renée Speyer, M. Limburg, Frits S.A.M. van Dam, Huda Huijer Abu‐Saad, Monique van Dijk and Martin J. Muller and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Pain.

In The Last Decade

Rianne de Wit

40 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rianne de Wit Netherlands 22 795 536 357 356 267 41 1.6k
Michelle Rhiner United States 25 807 1.0× 958 1.8× 737 2.1× 251 0.7× 147 0.6× 51 2.0k
Giampiero Porzio Italy 30 874 1.1× 755 1.4× 656 1.8× 357 1.0× 77 0.3× 118 2.3k
Andrew D. Feld United States 21 149 0.2× 372 0.7× 120 0.3× 642 1.8× 140 0.5× 66 2.0k
Marilyn Bookbinder United States 20 797 1.0× 697 1.3× 599 1.7× 476 1.3× 153 0.6× 45 1.9k
Jeannine M. Brant United States 23 347 0.4× 395 0.7× 432 1.2× 160 0.4× 127 0.5× 113 1.5k
G Evers Belgium 14 179 0.2× 210 0.4× 165 0.5× 164 0.5× 91 0.3× 27 1.0k
Gabriele Lindena Germany 22 524 0.7× 544 1.0× 876 2.5× 197 0.6× 596 2.2× 78 2.0k
Jo Ann Dalton United States 20 434 0.5× 369 0.7× 227 0.6× 181 0.5× 165 0.6× 46 1.0k
Marilène Filbet France 18 680 0.9× 598 1.1× 683 1.9× 192 0.5× 80 0.3× 90 1.6k
José Pereira Canada 17 595 0.7× 607 1.1× 643 1.8× 301 0.8× 53 0.2× 33 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Rianne de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rianne de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rianne de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rianne de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rianne de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rianne de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rianne de Wit. The network helps show where Rianne de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rianne de Wit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rianne de Wit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rianne de Wit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rianne de Wit. Rianne de Wit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Voskuilen, Charlotte S., Laura S. Mertens, Simon Horenblas, et al.. (2018). Superior efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy in cT3‐4aN0M0 compared to cT2N0M0 bladder cancer. International Journal of Cancer. 144(6). 1453–1459. 22 indexed citations
2.
Boyne, Josiane, Hubertus JM Vrijhoef, Fred Nieman, et al.. (2011). TELEMONITORING IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE: RESULTS FROM A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (THE TEHAF STUDY). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 57(14). E389–E389. 8 indexed citations
3.
Hendriks, Jeroen, Rianne de Wit, Hubertus JM Vrijhoef, Robert G. Tieleman, & Harry J.G.M. Crijns. (2010). An integrated chronic care program for patients with atrial fibrillation. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 47(10). 1310–1316. 26 indexed citations
4.
Halfens, Ruud J.G., et al.. (2010). Evaluation of the dissemination and implementation of pressure ulcer guidelines in Dutch nursing homes. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 17(4). 705–712. 5 indexed citations
5.
Halfens, Ruud J.G., et al.. (2010). Pressure ulcer guideline development and dissemination in Europe. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 19(11-12). 1495–1503. 17 indexed citations
6.
Boerlage, Anneke A., et al.. (2009). Pain Management in Dutch Nursing Homes Leaves Much to Be Desired. Pain Management Nursing. 10(1). 32–39. 27 indexed citations
7.
Geerts, Margot, et al.. (2009). Prevalence and impact of pain in diabetic neuropathy. 6(2). 58–64. 5 indexed citations
9.
Boerlage, Anneke A., Monique van Dijk, Dirk L. Stronks, Rianne de Wit, & Carin C.D. van der Rijt. (2008). Pain prevalence and characteristics in three Dutch residential homes. European Journal of Pain. 12(7). 910–916. 55 indexed citations
10.
Boerlage, Anneke A., et al.. (2007). Pijnregistratie en pijnbehandeling in verpleeghuizen kunnen nog beter.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 22(2). 99–105. 1 indexed citations
11.
Oldenmenger, Wendy H., Michael A. Echteld, Rianne de Wit, et al.. (2007). Analgesic Adherence Measurement in Cancer Patients: Comparison Between Electronic Monitoring and Diary. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 34(6). 639–647. 24 indexed citations
12.
Dijk, Monique van, et al.. (2006). Observation Scales for Pain Assessment in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairments or Communication Difficulties. Nursing Research. 56(1). 34–43. 75 indexed citations
13.
Wit, Rianne de, et al.. (2001). Assessment of Pain Cognitions in Cancer Patients with Chronic Pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 22(5). 911–924. 16 indexed citations
14.
Wit, Rianne de, et al.. (2001). The implementation of a Pain Monitoring Programme for nurses in daily clinical practice: results of a follow‐up study in five hospitals. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 35(4). 590–598. 60 indexed citations
16.
Wit, Rianne de, et al.. (2000). A Pain Monitoring Program for Nurses. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 20(6). 424–439. 96 indexed citations
17.
Wit, Rianne de, et al.. (2000). A Pain Monitoring Program for Nurses. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 19(6). 457–467. 70 indexed citations
18.
Wit, Rianne de, et al.. (2000). A Pain Monitoring Program for nurses: effect on the administration of analgesics. Pain. 89(1). 25–38. 46 indexed citations
19.
Wit, Rianne de, et al.. (1999). The Treatment of Chronic Cancer Pain in a Cancer Hospital in the Netherlands. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 17(5). 333–350. 37 indexed citations
20.
Wit, Rianne de, et al.. (1994). Comparison of Renal Function Parameters in the Assessment of <i>cis</i>-PIatin Induced IMephrotoxicity. ˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals. 66(3). 267–272. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026