Rianne de Wit

40 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Rianne de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 795
  • Speech and Hearing 208
  • Family Practice 65
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 536
  • Pharmacology 267
Replace G Evers with:
G Evers Belgium
Michelle Rhiner United States
Andrew D. Feld United States
Jo Ann Dalton United States
San Keller United States
Charles F. von Gunten United States
S. Bolge United States
Jeannine M. Brant United States
Marilee I. Donovan United States
Jeroen Peters Netherlands
Rianne de Wit relative to G Evers Belgium G Evers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
G Evers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rianne de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rianne de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rianne de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rianne de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rianne de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rianne de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rianne de Wit. The network helps show where Rianne de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rianne de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rianne de Wit Line = papers co-authored together Rianne de Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009210
2 1997134
3 1993105
4 200096
5 200985
6 199783
7 199980
8 200675
9 200173
10 200070
11 200160
12 200855
13 199954
14 200147
15 200046
16 200143
17 199939
18 199937
19 200927
20 201026

About Rianne de Wit

Rianne de Wit is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacology and Surgery, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (19 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (15 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (3 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (795 citations), Speech and Hearing (208 citations), Family Practice (65 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (536 citations) and Pharmacology (267 citations). Rianne de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frits van Dam, Karin van der Heijden, Linda C. Zandbelt, Frits S.A.M. van Dam, Gerrie Bours, Renée Speyer, M. Limburg, Huda Huijer Abu‐Saad, Monique van Dijk and Martin J. Muller. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Journal of Advanced Nursing, European Journal of Pain and European Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact