Rhoda Wilkie

415 total citations
13 papers, 283 citations indexed

About

Rhoda Wilkie is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Social Psychology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Rhoda Wilkie has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 283 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Geography, Planning and Development, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Rhoda Wilkie's work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers). Rhoda Wilkie is often cited by papers focused on Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers). Rhoda Wilkie collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Rhoda Wilkie's co-authors include David Inglis, John Bone, David Bradley, Peter M. Blau, Chris Argyris, J. E. T. Eldridge, Andrew McKinnon, Liz Spencer, Lisa Jean Moore and Nik Taylor and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Sociology, Journal of Rural Studies and Sociology.

In The Last Decade

Rhoda Wilkie

13 papers receiving 260 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rhoda Wilkie United Kingdom	7	123	122	50	46	46	13	283
Lindsay Hamilton United Kingdom	13	173 1.4×	140 1.1×	105 2.1×	32 0.7×	34 0.7×	27	421
Gary L. Francione United States	10	189 1.5×	152 1.2×	101 2.0×	126 2.7×	51 1.1×	35	605
Bernice Bovenkerk Netherlands	14	41 0.3×	118 1.0×	50 1.0×	92 2.0×	32 0.7×	39	466
David Nibert United States	9	163 1.3×	98 0.8×	129 2.6×	31 0.7×	53 1.2×	13	405
Jocelyne Porcher France	12	139 1.1×	133 1.1×	176 3.5×	123 2.7×	17 0.4×	58	512
Kendra Coulter Canada	10	120 1.0×	110 0.9×	96 1.9×	24 0.5×	25 0.5×	24	322
Chris Wilbert United Kingdom	8	281 2.3×	135 1.1×	102 2.0×	18 0.4×	57 1.2×	15	449
Adrian Evans United Kingdom	6	79 0.6×	70 0.6×	28 0.6×	97 2.1×	20 0.4×	16	302
Barbara Noske Canada	5	165 1.3×	86 0.7×	44 0.9×	19 0.4×	50 1.1×	7	296
Carrie Packwood Freeman United States	10	90 0.7×	47 0.4×	76 1.5×	27 0.6×	63 1.4×	27	299

Countries citing papers authored by Rhoda Wilkie

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rhoda Wilkie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rhoda Wilkie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhoda Wilkie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rhoda Wilkie

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rhoda Wilkie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rhoda Wilkie. The network helps show where Rhoda Wilkie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rhoda Wilkie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rhoda Wilkie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rhoda Wilkie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rhoda Wilkie. Rhoda Wilkie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Wilkie, Rhoda, et al.. (2019). How Prevalent Are Invertebrates in Human-Animal Scholarship? Scoping Study of Anthrozoös and Society & Animals. Society and Animals. 27(7). 656–677. 2 indexed citations

2.

Moore, Lisa Jean & Rhoda Wilkie. (2019). Introduction to The Silent Majority: Invertebrates in Human-Animal Studies. Society and Animals. 27(7). 653–655. 5 indexed citations

3.

Taylor, Nik, et al.. (2018). A sociology of multi-species relations. Journal of sociology. 54(4). 463–466. 1 indexed citations

4.

Wilkie, Rhoda. (2018). ‘Minilivestock’ farming: Who is farming edible insects in Europe and North America?. Journal of sociology. 54(4). 520–537. 22 indexed citations

5.

Wilkie, Rhoda. (2014). MIĘDZY CZŁOWIEKIEM A BESTIĄ: Animalising Social Life: An introduction. 15(1). 13–25. 1 indexed citations

6.

Wilkie, Rhoda. (2013). Multispecies Scholarship and Encounters: Changing Assumptions at the Human-Animal Nexus. Sociology. 49(2). 323–339. 47 indexed citations

7.

Wilkie, Rhoda & Andrew McKinnon. (2013). George Herbert Mead on Humans and Other Animals: Social Relations after Human-Animal Studies. Sociological Research Online. 18(4). 182–194. 7 indexed citations

8.

Wilkie, Rhoda. (2013). Academic “Dirty Work”. Society and Animals. 23(3). 211–230. 15 indexed citations

9.

Wilkie, Rhoda & David Inglis. (2007). Animals and Society: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences. 3 indexed citations

10.

Inglis, David, John Bone, & Rhoda Wilkie. (2005). From 'nature' to 'natures' : contestation and reconstruction. Routledge eBooks. 2 indexed citations

11.

Inglis, David, John Bone, & Rhoda Wilkie. (2005). Nature: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences. 18 indexed citations

12.

Wilkie, Rhoda. (2004). Sentient commodities and productive paradoxes: the ambiguous nature of human–livestock relations in Northeast Scotland. Journal of Rural Studies. 21(2). 213–230. 130 indexed citations

13.

Spencer, Liz, J. E. T. Eldridge, David Bradley, et al.. (1976). A Sociology of Organisations. British Journal of Sociology. 27(4). 513–513. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact