This map shows the geographic impact of R.G. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.G. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.G. Cooper more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.G. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.G. Cooper. The network helps show where R.G. Cooper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.G. Cooper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.G. Cooper.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.G. Cooper based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R.G. Cooper. R.G. Cooper is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pierzchała, Mariusz, Chandra S. Pareek, Paweł Lisowski, et al.. (2011). Expression profile of porcine MYF5 and MYF6 genes in skeletal muscles of young growing gilts of five breeds at different ages, based on the most stable reference genes.. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 29(3). 231–246.5 indexed citations
4.
Poławska, Ewa, Joanna Marchewka, R.G. Cooper, et al.. (2011). The ostrich meat - an updated review. II. Nutritive value.. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 29(2). 89–97.62 indexed citations
Jóźwik, Artur, Emilia Bagnicka, Nina Strzałkowska, et al.. (2010). The oxidative status of milking goats after per os administration of N-acetylcysteine.. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 28(2). 143–152.11 indexed citations
7.
Charuta, Anna, et al.. (2010). The content of selected minerals in the tibio-tarsal bone in 14-month-old ostriches (Struthio camelus) as influenced by sex and place of the bone.. 8–12.5 indexed citations
Charuta, Anna, et al.. (2008). Spongious matrix of the tibio-tarsal bone of ostriches [Struthio camelus] - a digital analysis. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy. 52(2).11 indexed citations
Horbańczuk, Jarosław Olav, et al.. (2007). A search for sequence similarity between chicken (Gallus domesticus) and ostrich (Struthio camelus) microsatellite markers. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 25(4). 283–288.24 indexed citations
Horbańczuk, Jarosław Olav, et al.. (2004). Total fat, cholesterol and fatty acids of meat of grey nandu [Rhea americana]. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 22(2).4 indexed citations
15.
Horbańczuk, Jarosław Olav, Irek Malecki, R.G. Cooper, et al.. (2004). Cholesterol content and fatty acid composition of two fat depots from slaughter ostriches (Struthio camelus) aged 14 months. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 22(2). 247–251.14 indexed citations
Horbańczuk, Jarosław Olav, et al.. (2003). Cholesterol content and fatty acid composition of egg yolk of grey nandu (Rhea americana). Animal Science Papers and Reports. 21(4).2 indexed citations
18.
Horbańczuk, Jarosław Olav, et al.. (2003). A case of ostrich (Struthio camelus) twins developing from a double-yolked egg. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 21(3).9 indexed citations
19.
Horbańczuk, Jarosław Olav, R.G. Cooper, Artur Jóźwik, et al.. (2003). Cholesterol content and fatty acid composition of fat from culled breeding ostriches [Struthio camelus]. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 21(4). 271–275.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.