RETO CANDINAS
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Surgery
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Fırat DuruRoger LuechingerPeter BoesigerVolkert A. ZeijlemakerFerenc FolláthMarkus B. ScheideggerUrs BauersfeldFranz W. Amann
- Topics
- Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (26 papers)Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (24 papers)Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (19 papers)
- Cited by
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineComplementary and alternative medicineRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
RETO CANDINAS
68 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.3k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 393
- Surgery 242
- Complementary and alternative medicine 178
- Biomedical Engineering 128
Countries citing papers authored by RETO CANDINAS
This map shows the geographic impact of RETO CANDINAS's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by RETO CANDINAS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RETO CANDINAS more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by RETO CANDINAS
This network shows the impact of papers produced by RETO CANDINAS. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by RETO CANDINAS. The network helps show where RETO CANDINAS may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of RETO CANDINAS
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of RETO CANDINAS. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of RETO CANDINAS based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with RETO CANDINAS. RETO CANDINAS is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 233 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 101 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 61 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About RETO CANDINAS
RETO CANDINAS is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine and Medical Laboratory Technology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (26 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (24 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.3k citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (178 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (393 citations). RETO CANDINAS has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Fırat Duru, Roger Luechinger, Peter Boesiger, Volkert A. Zeijlemaker, Ferenc Folláth, Markus B. Scheidegger, Urs Bauersfeld, Franz W. Amann, Christoph Scharf and Rolf Jenni. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.