Reshma Naik
About
In The Last Decade
Reshma Naik
14 papers receiving 317 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Infectious Diseases 250
- Epidemiology 162
- General Health Professions 154
- Virology 52
- Economics and Econometrics 37
Countries citing papers authored by Reshma Naik
This map shows the geographic impact of Reshma Naik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reshma Naik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reshma Naik more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Reshma Naik
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reshma Naik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reshma Naik. The network helps show where Reshma Naik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Reshma Naik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Reshma Naik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Reshma Naik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Reshma Naik. Reshma Naik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 62 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 44 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 25 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.