2.1k total citations 55 papers, 597 citations indexed
About
Renato Ortiz is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies and Political Science and International Relations.
According to data from OpenAlex, Renato Ortiz has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 597 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 12 papers in Urban Studies and 10 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Renato Ortiz's work include Urban and sociocultural dynamics (11 papers), Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies (6 papers) and Social and Economic Solidarity (4 papers). Renato Ortiz is often cited by papers focused on Urban and sociocultural dynamics (11 papers), Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies (6 papers) and Social and Economic Solidarity (4 papers). Renato Ortiz collaborates with scholars based in Brazil, France and Spain. Renato Ortiz's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Theory Culture & Society and Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais.
This map shows the geographic impact of Renato Ortiz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renato Ortiz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renato Ortiz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renato Ortiz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renato Ortiz. The network helps show where Renato Ortiz may publish in the future.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.