Renato Docimo
Impact in
-
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Neural dynamics and brain function
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies 16
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 5
- Neural dynamics and brain function 2
- Co-authors
- Gioacchino Tedeschi (17 shared papers)Antonio Gallo (16 shared papers)Alvino Bisecco (15 shared papers)Simona Bonavita (14 shared papers)Fabrizio Esposito (10 shared papers)Rosaria Sacco (10 shared papers)Mario Cirillo (9 shared papers)Alessandro d’Ambrosio (11 shared papers)
- Journals
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal (4 papers)Neurology (3 papers)Journal of Neurology (3 papers)Pharmaceuticals (1 paper)Neurological Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Renato Docimo
18 papers receiving 731 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 537
- Cognitive Neuroscience 227
- Developmental Neuroscience 47
- Neurology 153
- Neurology 79
Countries citing papers authored by Renato Docimo
This map shows the geographic impact of Renato Docimo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renato Docimo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renato Docimo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Renato Docimo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renato Docimo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renato Docimo. The network helps show where Renato Docimo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Renato Docimo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 147 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 92 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 51 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 50 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 49 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 48 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 14 | Riga-Fede disease and neonatal teeth. | 2012 | 14 |
| 15 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 1 |
About Renato Docimo
Renato Docimo is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Oncology, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (16 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (2 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (537 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (227 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (47 citations), Neurology (153 citations) and Neurology (79 citations). Renato Docimo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Gioacchino Tedeschi, Antonio Gallo, Alvino Bisecco, Simona Bonavita, Fabrizio Esposito, Rosaria Sacco, Mario Cirillo, Alessandro d’Ambrosio, Luigi Lavorgna and Marida Della Corte. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Neurology, Journal of Neurology, Pharmaceuticals and Neurological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.