Renate Kieft
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Research and Theory top 5%
- Health Information Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Anneke L. FranckeDiana DelnoijDewi StalpersMarian KaljouwDimitri van der LindenMarieke J. SchuurmansMaud HeinenCoen H. van Gool
- Topics
- Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers)Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers)Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Advanced NursingBMC Health Services ResearchInternational Journal of Medical Informatics
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsIndia
In The Last Decade
Renate Kieft
7 papers receiving 354 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- General Health Professions 230
- Clinical Psychology 58
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 50
- Research and Theory 45
- Health Information Management 41
Countries citing papers authored by Renate Kieft
This map shows the geographic impact of Renate Kieft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renate Kieft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renate Kieft more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Renate Kieft
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renate Kieft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renate Kieft. The network helps show where Renate Kieft may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Renate Kieft
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Renate Kieft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Renate Kieft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Renate Kieft. Renate Kieft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | How nurses and their work environment affect patient experiences of the quality of care: a qualitative studybreakdown → | 306 |
About Renate Kieft
Renate Kieft is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Research and Theory and Health Information Management, having authored 7 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers) and Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (45 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (38 citations) and Leadership and Management (20 citations). Renate Kieft has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and India. Frequent co-authors include Anneke L. Francke, Diana Delnoij, Dewi Stalpers, Marian Kaljouw, Dimitri van der Linden, Marieke J. Schuurmans, Maud Heinen and Coen H. van Gool. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, BMC Health Services Research and International Journal of Medical Informatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.