Renata Hari
About
In The Last Decade
Renata Hari
8 papers receiving 654 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 242
- Water Science and Technology 212
- Ecology 188
- Environmental Chemistry 116
- Pollution 90
Countries citing papers authored by Renata Hari
This map shows the geographic impact of Renata Hari's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renata Hari with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renata Hari more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Renata Hari
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renata Hari. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renata Hari. The network helps show where Renata Hari may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Renata Hari
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Renata Hari. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Renata Hari based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Renata Hari. Renata Hari is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 63 | |
| 6 | 325 | |
| 7 | Trendanalyse der NADUF – Messresultate 1974 bis 1998 | 4 |
| 8 | 133 | |
| 9 | 137 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.