R.D. Speller

621 total citations
43 papers, 444 citations indexed

About

R.D. Speller is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Radiation and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, R.D. Speller has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 444 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 23 papers in Radiation and 23 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in R.D. Speller's work include Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (23 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (18 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (14 papers). R.D. Speller is often cited by papers focused on Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (23 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (18 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (14 papers). R.D. Speller collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. R.D. Speller's co-authors include Gary Royle, D. R. White, Julie A. Horrocks, Peter R. T. Munro, Alessandro Olivo, Konstantin Ignatyev, Michael Farquharson, Megan B. Brickley, Paul Taylor and L. N. Rothenberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Physics in Medicine and Biology and Review of Scientific Instruments.

In The Last Decade

R.D. Speller

43 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R.D. Speller United Kingdom 11 249 241 210 91 87 43 444
O.D. Gonçalves Brazil 13 263 1.1× 179 0.7× 253 1.2× 85 0.9× 273 3.1× 50 510
Erich Hell Germany 13 172 0.7× 352 1.5× 142 0.7× 37 0.4× 95 1.1× 21 565
Gerhard Martens Germany 11 360 1.4× 282 1.2× 191 0.9× 26 0.3× 28 0.3× 18 452
Vladimir A. Arkadiev Germany 10 69 0.3× 63 0.3× 154 0.7× 39 0.4× 37 0.4× 26 233
J. Kosanetzky Germany 10 439 1.8× 314 1.3× 288 1.4× 59 0.6× 312 3.6× 14 649
James Scuffham United Kingdom 9 178 0.7× 171 0.7× 158 0.8× 56 0.6× 33 0.4× 35 352
Elena Eggl Germany 12 225 0.9× 177 0.7× 356 1.7× 40 0.4× 21 0.2× 26 468
P. Berkvens France 11 77 0.3× 160 0.7× 215 1.0× 238 2.6× 48 0.6× 46 490
Regine Gradl Germany 11 125 0.5× 73 0.3× 194 0.9× 49 0.5× 15 0.2× 17 314
F. Krejci Czechia 11 117 0.5× 75 0.3× 185 0.9× 24 0.3× 10 0.1× 42 340

Countries citing papers authored by R.D. Speller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.D. Speller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.D. Speller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.D. Speller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.D. Speller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.D. Speller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.D. Speller. The network helps show where R.D. Speller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.D. Speller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.D. Speller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.D. Speller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R.D. Speller. R.D. Speller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zhao, Chumin, et al.. (2015). 50μm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 60(23). 8977–9001. 24 indexed citations
2.
Arvanitis, Costas & R.D. Speller. (2009). Quantitative contrast-enhanced mammography for contrast medium kinetics studies. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 54(20). 6041–6064. 12 indexed citations
3.
Stelt, P.F. van der, R.D. Speller, Andrea Galbiati, et al.. (2006). End-user survey for digital sensor characteristics: a pilot questionnaire study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 35(3). 147–151. 6 indexed citations
4.
Royle, Gary, et al.. (2004). Development of a pixellated germanium Compton camera for nuclear medicine. 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515). 3687–3690. 3 indexed citations
5.
Lambrou, Tryphon, et al.. (2002). Statistical Classification of Digital Mammograms Using Features from the Spatial and Wavelet Domains. UCL Discovery (University College London). 5 indexed citations
6.
Speller, R.D., Gary Royle, Ian Cullum, et al.. (2002). A possible role for silicon microstrip detectors in nuclear medicine: Compton imaging of positron emitters. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 477(1-3). 514–520. 4 indexed citations
7.
Royle, Gary & R.D. Speller. (2002). Compton scatter imaging of a nuclear industry site. 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 365–368. 3 indexed citations
8.
Speller, R.D., Gary Royle, Ian Cullum, et al.. (2000). Design of a small laboratory Compton camera for the imaging of positron emitters. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 47(3). 1155–1162. 9 indexed citations
9.
Royle, Gary & R.D. Speller. (1995). Quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis of bone and marrow volumes in excised femoral head samples. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 40(9). 1487–1498. 45 indexed citations
10.
Speller, R.D., et al.. (1995). The effect of scattered radiation in dual-energy analysis. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 40(10). 1619–1632. 1 indexed citations
11.
Court, Laurence E. & R.D. Speller. (1995). A multiparameter optimization of digital mammography. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 40(11). 1841–1861. 8 indexed citations
12.
Royle, Gary & R.D. Speller. (1994). Design of a Compton camera for imaging 662 keV radionuclide distributions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 348(2-3). 623–626. 8 indexed citations
13.
Speller, R.D., et al.. (1993). A real time dual-energy probe for tissue characterization during fluoroscopy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 38(3). 379–388. 2 indexed citations
14.
Mooney, Michael & R.D. Speller. (1992). Photon absorption measurements of bone density in the presence of scattered radiation. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 37(10). 1873–1882. 5 indexed citations
15.
Speller, R.D. & Julie A. Horrocks. (1991). Photon scattering-a 'new' source of information in medicine and biology?. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 36(1). 1–6. 43 indexed citations
16.
Speller, R.D., et al.. (1989). Instrumentation and techniques in bone density measurements. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations
17.
Shope, Thomas B., et al.. (1982). Radiation dosimetry survey of computed tomography systems from ten manufacturers. British Journal of Radiology. 55(649). 60–69. 40 indexed citations
18.
Speller, R.D., et al.. (1981). An evaluation of CT systems from ten manufacturers. British Journal of Radiology. 54(648). 1053–1061. 9 indexed citations
19.
White, D. R. & R.D. Speller. (1980). The measurement of effective photon energy and “linearity” in computerized tomography. British Journal of Radiology. 53(625). 5–11. 15 indexed citations
20.
White, D. R., et al.. (1979). A SURVEY OF 20 CT SYSTEMS. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 3(4). 573–573. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026