Raymond Hames

3.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
49 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Raymond Hames is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Raymond Hames has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 10 papers in Social Psychology and 9 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Raymond Hames's work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (16 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (5 papers). Raymond Hames is often cited by papers focused on Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (16 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (5 papers). Raymond Hames collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Raymond Hames's co-authors include William T. Vickers, William M. Denevan, Napoleon A. Chagnon, Patricia Draper, Ross A. Thompson, Wayne A. Babchuk, Kim Hill, Karen L. Kramer, Hillard Kaplan and Michael Gurven and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Raymond Hames

45 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians 1984 2026 1998 2012 1984 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Raymond Hames United States 23 490 454 427 315 273 49 2.0k
Thomas N. Headland United States 18 328 0.7× 602 1.3× 395 0.9× 138 0.4× 487 1.8× 39 2.1k
Matthew S. McGlone United States 38 1.1k 2.2× 525 1.2× 568 1.3× 530 1.7× 253 0.9× 102 3.7k
Elizabeth Cashdan United States 28 908 1.9× 898 2.0× 748 1.8× 251 0.8× 485 1.8× 49 3.2k
Michael Alvard United States 16 425 0.9× 987 2.2× 604 1.4× 499 1.6× 136 0.5× 24 2.3k
William H. Durham United States 20 307 0.6× 1.1k 2.5× 390 0.9× 245 0.8× 124 0.5× 40 2.3k
James S. Boster United States 26 729 1.5× 399 0.9× 488 1.1× 115 0.4× 84 0.3× 52 2.0k
Carol R. Ember United States 32 705 1.4× 1.5k 3.4× 749 1.8× 141 0.4× 489 1.8× 104 3.4k
Allen Johnson United States 20 239 0.5× 712 1.6× 254 0.6× 96 0.3× 411 1.5× 43 2.2k
Jerome O’Connell United States 18 1.0k 2.1× 690 1.5× 841 2.0× 691 2.2× 991 3.6× 40 3.3k
Michael L. Burton United States 21 171 0.3× 365 0.8× 174 0.4× 211 0.7× 108 0.4× 58 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Raymond Hames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Raymond Hames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raymond Hames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raymond Hames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Raymond Hames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raymond Hames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raymond Hames. The network helps show where Raymond Hames may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raymond Hames

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raymond Hames. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raymond Hames based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Raymond Hames. Raymond Hames is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Venkataraman, Vivek V., J C Hoffman, Helen Davis, et al.. (2024). Female foragers sometimes hunt, yet gendered divisions of labor are real: a comment on Anderson et al. (2023) The Myth of Man the Hunter. Evolution and Human Behavior. 45(4). 106586–106586. 4 indexed citations
2.
Hames, Raymond. (2019). Pacifying Hunter-Gatherers. Human Nature. 30(2). 155–175. 27 indexed citations
3.
Jaeggi, Adrian V., Karen L. Kramer, Raymond Hames, et al.. (2017). Human grooming in comparative perspective: People in six small‐scale societies groom less but socialize just as much as expected for a typical primate. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 162(4). 810–816. 11 indexed citations
4.
Hames, Raymond, et al.. (2016). Is Male Androphilia a Context-Dependent Cross-Cultural Universal?. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 46(1). 63–71. 14 indexed citations
5.
Koster, Jeremy, George Leckie, Andrew Miller, & Raymond Hames. (2015). Multilevel modeling analysis of dyadic network data with an application to Ye'kwana food sharing. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 157(3). 507–512. 17 indexed citations
6.
Cafer, Anne, et al.. (2012). Pathways to greater food production: lessons from Ethiopia. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). 1 indexed citations
7.
Hames, Raymond, et al.. (2012). A Survey of Non-Classical Polyandry. Human Nature. 23(2). 149–172. 45 indexed citations
8.
Hames, Raymond, et al.. (2007). Meal sharing among the Ye’kwana. Human Nature. 18(1). 1–21. 42 indexed citations
9.
Walker, Robert S., Michael Gurven, Kim Hill, et al.. (2006). Growth rates and life histories in twenty‐two small‐scale societies. American Journal of Human Biology. 18(3). 295–311. 296 indexed citations
10.
Borofsky, Robert, et al.. (2005). Yanomami: The Fierce Controversy and What We Can Learn from It. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 35 indexed citations
11.
Hames, Raymond & Patricia Draper. (2004). Women’s work, child care, and helpers-at-the-nest in a hunter-gatherer society. Human Nature. 15(4). 319–341. 50 indexed citations
12.
Lucock, Mike, et al.. (2004). Graduate primary care mental health workers providing safe and effective client work: what is realistic?. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield). 3 indexed citations
13.
Hagen, Edward H., Raymond Hames, Nathan Craig, Matthew Lauer, & Michael E. Price. (2001). PARENTAL INVESTMENT AND CHILD HEALTH IN A YANOMAMÖ VILLAGE SUFFERING SHORT-TERM FOOD STRESS. Journal of Biosocial Science. 33(4). 503–528. 43 indexed citations
14.
Draper, Patricia & Raymond Hames. (2000). Birth order, sibling investment, and fertility among Ju/’Hoansi (!Kung). Human Nature. 11(2). 117–156. 53 indexed citations
15.
Hames, Raymond. (1989). Distribution temporelle des principales especes de taons (Diptera : Tabanidae) nuisibles au betail en Guyane francaise. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 2 indexed citations
16.
Hames, Raymond. (1988). The Allocation of Parental Care among the Ye'kwana. Insecta mundi. 51 indexed citations
17.
Rivière, Peter, Raymond Hames, & William T. Vickers. (1986). Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians. Man. 21(2). 366–366. 5 indexed citations
18.
Johnson, Allen, Robert L. Carneiro, Paul Diener, et al.. (1982). Reductionism in Cultural Ecology: The Amazon Case [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology. 23(4). 413–428. 23 indexed citations
19.
Chagnon, Napoleon A. & Raymond Hames. (1980). Response : Amazon Warfare. Science. 207(4431). 592–593.
20.
Hames, Raymond. (1979). A comparison of the efficiencies of the shotgun and the bow in neotropical forest hunting. Human Ecology. 7(3). 219–252. 112 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026