Raymond E. Phinney

854 total citations
10 papers, 649 citations indexed

About

Raymond E. Phinney is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Raymond E. Phinney has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 649 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Raymond E. Phinney's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). Raymond E. Phinney is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). Raymond E. Phinney collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Raymond E. Phinney's co-authors include Edgar A. DeYoe, James W. Lewis, John J. Janik, Jeffrey R. Binder, Frederic L. Wightman, Robert Patterson, Christopher Bowd, Julie A. Brefczynski‐Lewis, Ralph M. Siegel and Milena Raffi and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Neurophysiology and Cerebral Cortex.

In The Last Decade

Raymond E. Phinney

10 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Raymond E. Phinney United States 9 564 289 211 57 41 10 649
Silu Fan China 15 988 1.8× 198 0.7× 90 0.4× 56 1.0× 33 0.8× 24 1.0k
Michela Adriani Switzerland 13 738 1.3× 376 1.3× 101 0.5× 47 0.8× 60 1.5× 20 820
Mathias S. Oechslin Switzerland 13 796 1.4× 201 0.7× 194 0.9× 65 1.1× 69 1.7× 18 945
Zarinah K. Agnew United Kingdom 12 384 0.7× 188 0.7× 158 0.7× 79 1.4× 25 0.6× 15 498
Jess R. Kerlin United States 9 543 1.0× 164 0.6× 83 0.4× 19 0.3× 46 1.1× 13 605
Urte Roeber Germany 18 967 1.7× 415 1.4× 73 0.3× 40 0.7× 19 0.5× 45 1.0k
Keith B. Doelling United States 8 994 1.8× 255 0.9× 78 0.4× 126 2.2× 35 0.9× 13 1.1k
Philippe Albouy Canada 16 959 1.7× 271 0.9× 94 0.4× 66 1.2× 26 0.6× 32 1.0k
Davide Bottari Italy 17 859 1.5× 546 1.9× 102 0.5× 142 2.5× 96 2.3× 53 976
Mark Hymers United Kingdom 12 553 1.0× 100 0.3× 54 0.3× 55 1.0× 21 0.5× 21 611

Countries citing papers authored by Raymond E. Phinney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Raymond E. Phinney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raymond E. Phinney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raymond E. Phinney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Raymond E. Phinney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raymond E. Phinney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raymond E. Phinney. The network helps show where Raymond E. Phinney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raymond E. Phinney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raymond E. Phinney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raymond E. Phinney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Raymond E. Phinney. Raymond E. Phinney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Huddleston, Wendy E., James W. Lewis, Raymond E. Phinney, & Edgar A. DeYoe. (2008). Auditory and visual attention-based apparent motion share functional parallels. Perception & Psychophysics. 70(7). 1207–1216. 16 indexed citations
2.
Lewis, James W., Raymond E. Phinney, Julie A. Brefczynski‐Lewis, & Edgar A. DeYoe. (2006). Lefties Get It “Right” When Hearing Tool Sounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 18(8). 1314–1330. 63 indexed citations
3.
Lewis, James W., et al.. (2005). Distinct Cortical Pathways for Processing Tool versus Animal Sounds. Journal of Neuroscience. 25(21). 5148–5158. 245 indexed citations
4.
Lewis, James W., et al.. (2004). Human Brain Regions Involved in Recognizing Environmental Sounds. Cerebral Cortex. 14(9). 1008–1021. 181 indexed citations
5.
Siegel, Ralph M., Milena Raffi, Raymond E. Phinney, Jessica A. Turner, & Gábor Jandó. (2003). Functional Architecture of Eye Position Gain Fields in Visual Association Cortex of Behaving Monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology. 90(2). 1279–1294. 35 indexed citations
6.
Phinney, Raymond E.. (2000). Speed Selectivity for Optic Flow in Area 7a of the Behaving Macaque. Cerebral Cortex. 10(4). 413–421. 36 indexed citations
7.
Phinney, Raymond E. & Ralph M. Siegel. (1999). Stored Representations of three-Dimensional Objects in the Absence of Two-Dimensional Cues. Perception. 28(6). 725–737. 2 indexed citations
8.
Patterson, Robert, et al.. (1997). Speed Discrimination of Stereoscopic (Cyclopean) Motion. Vision Research. 37(7). 871–878. 14 indexed citations
9.
Phinney, Raymond E., Christopher Bowd, & Robert Patterson. (1997). Direction-selective Coding of Stereoscopic (Cyclopean) Motion. Vision Research. 37(7). 865–869. 41 indexed citations
10.
Bowd, Christopher, David Rose, Raymond E. Phinney, & Robert Patterson. (1996). Enduring Stereoscopic Motion Aftereffects Induced by Prolonged Adaptation. Vision Research. 36(22). 3655–3660. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026