Rasmus Røge

42 papers receiving 822 citations

Peers

Rasmus Røge
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Biological Psychiatry 98
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 238
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 32
  • Cancer Research 79
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 103
Replace Hon‐Cheong So with:
Hon‐Cheong So Hong Kong
E. Klieser Austria
Catherine Conway United States
Norman C. Moore United States
Ke Xu China
Justin Davis United States
Dennis J. Chute United States
P. Decker Germany
Antonia L. Pritchard Australia
Masayuki Takase Japan
Rasmus Røge relative to Hon‐Cheong So Hong Kong Hon‐Cheong So's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Hon‐Cheong So · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rasmus Røge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rasmus Røge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rasmus Røge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rasmus Røge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rasmus Røge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rasmus Røge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rasmus Røge. The network helps show where Rasmus Røge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rasmus Røge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rasmus Røge Line = papers co-authored together Rasmus Røge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The validity of the schizophrenia diagnosis in the Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register is good.
2013163
2 2012129
3 201275
4 201668
5 201645
6 201734
7 202133
8
[Results of the stimulation of the spinothalamic fasciculus and their bearing on the physiopathology of pain].
196030
9 200629
10 201623
11 201920
12 201718
13 201516
14 201415
15 201715
16 202013
17 201913
18 201911
19 201810
20 20138

About Rasmus Røge

Rasmus Røge is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology and Oncology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 845 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (5 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (5 papers), AI in cancer detection (5 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (98 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (238 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (32 citations), Cancer Research (79 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (103 citations). Rasmus Røge has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Jimmi Nielsen, Christoph U. Correll, Mogens Vyberg, Søren Nielsen, Søren Dinesen Østergaard, Bjarne Kuno Møller, Rikke Riber‐Hansen, Holger J. Sørensen, Ole Schjerning and David Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology, Cytometry Part A, Apmis, Schizophrenia Bulletin and IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact