739 total citations 61 papers, 542 citations indexed
About
Range Experiment Station is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Plant Science.
According to data from OpenAlex, Range Experiment Station has authored 61 papers receiving a total of 542 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 22 papers in Ecology and 13 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Range Experiment Station's work include Forest ecology and management (14 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (12 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (8 papers). Range Experiment Station is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (14 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (12 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (8 papers). Range Experiment Station collaborates with scholars based in . Range Experiment Station's co-authors include David R. Patton, Kieth E. Severson, Robert C. Szaro, Gene D. Amman, Walter E. Cole, Richard Smardon, Leonard F. Ruggiero, Thomas D. Landis, William S. Platts and G. Wayne Minshall and has published in prestigious journals such as OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information), Medical Entomology and Zoology and Journal of the Korean Forestry Society.
In The Last Decade
Range Experiment Station
52 papers
receiving
406 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Range Experiment Station
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Range Experiment Station's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Range Experiment Station with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Range Experiment Station more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Range Experiment Station
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Range Experiment Station. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Range Experiment Station. The network helps show where Range Experiment Station may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Range Experiment Station
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Range Experiment Station.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Range Experiment Station based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Range Experiment Station. Range Experiment Station is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Station, Range Experiment, et al.. (2018). Genetic Variation in Douglas-Fir: A 20-Year Test of Provenances in Eastern Nebraska. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).
2.
Block, William M., et al.. (1997). Songbird ecology in southwestern Ponderosa pine forests.1 indexed citations
3.
Koo, Chang‐Duck, et al.. (1995). Effects of light and inoculation of Frankia and Alpova diplophloeus on the tripartite symbioses development in Alnus rubra Bong. seedlings. Journal of the Korean Forestry Society.3 indexed citations
4.
Station, Range Experiment, et al.. (1995). Forest health through silviculture.19 indexed citations
5.
Ruggiero, Leonard F., et al.. (1994). The Scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores.38 indexed citations
6.
McCollum, Daniel W., et al.. (1990). The Net economic value of recreation on the national forests.2 indexed citations
7.
Flather, Curtis H., et al.. (1989). An analysis of the wildlife and fish situation in the United States. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).6 indexed citations
8.
Station, Range Experiment, et al.. (1988). Prairie chickens on the Sheyenne National Grasslands.8 indexed citations
9.
Alexander, Robert R., et al.. (1986). Forest vegetation of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests in central Colorado.1 indexed citations
10.
Bormann, Bernard T., et al.. (1985). Early wide spacing in red alder (Alnus rubra Bong.).3 indexed citations
11.
Station, Range Experiment, et al.. (1982). User's guide to the national fuel appraisal process. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
12.
Station, Range Experiment, et al.. (1976). Converting brush and hardwoods to conifers on high sites in western Washington and Oregon.1 indexed citations
13.
Mueggler, Walter F., et al.. (1974). Mountain grassland and shrubland habitat types of western Montana. 1974.20 indexed citations
14.
Station, Range Experiment, et al.. (1972). Great Basin Station.2 indexed citations
15.
Alexander, Robert R., et al.. (1972). Partial cutting practices in old-growth lodgepole pine :. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).7 indexed citations
16.
Wagar, J. Alan, et al.. (1970). Predicting the durability of forest recreation sites in northern Utah.1 indexed citations
17.
Station, Range Experiment, et al.. (1970). Northern Idaho ponderosa pine racial variation study.1 indexed citations
18.
Station, Range Experiment, et al.. (1961). Silvicultural control of dwarfmistletoe on southwestern ponderosa pine.4 indexed citations
19.
Station, Range Experiment, et al.. (1960). Some water problems and hydrologic characteristics of the Umpqua Basin.2 indexed citations
20.
Tarrant, Robert F., et al.. (1953). Soil moisture and the distribution of lodgepole and ponderosa pine.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.