Randy Lewis

2.8k total citations
88 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Randy Lewis is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Randy Lewis has authored 88 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 79 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 11 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 10 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in Randy Lewis's work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (77 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (75 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (51 papers). Randy Lewis is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (77 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (75 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (51 papers). Randy Lewis collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Randy Lewis's co-authors include R. M. Woloshyn, Kim Maltman, Renwick J. Hudspith, Anthony Francis, Nilmani Mathur, Francesco Sannino, Claudio Pica, Abdou Abdel-Rehim, Harold W. Fearing and Walter Wilcox and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Randy Lewis

85 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Randy Lewis Canada 22 1.5k 228 121 105 72 88 1.7k
Craig McNeile United Kingdom 37 3.5k 2.3× 137 0.6× 149 1.2× 52 0.5× 82 1.1× 115 3.6k
Santiago Peris Spain 27 2.1k 1.4× 88 0.4× 33 0.3× 64 0.6× 110 1.5× 105 2.2k
A. Harindranath United States 20 1.5k 1.0× 364 1.6× 186 1.5× 34 0.3× 81 1.1× 64 1.6k
K. Hornbostel United States 22 2.5k 1.6× 137 0.6× 129 1.1× 30 0.3× 56 0.8× 31 2.6k
V. O. Galkin Russia 32 3.6k 2.4× 240 1.1× 100 0.8× 22 0.2× 26 0.4× 90 3.7k
Fulvia De Fazio Italy 32 2.7k 1.8× 85 0.4× 41 0.3× 33 0.3× 197 2.7× 114 2.7k
A. Bramòn Spain 25 1.4k 0.9× 245 1.1× 38 0.3× 133 1.3× 23 0.3× 93 1.6k
Bastian Kubis Germany 32 3.2k 2.1× 229 1.0× 34 0.3× 89 0.8× 197 2.7× 108 3.3k
V. Riquer Italy 21 2.1k 1.4× 208 0.9× 89 0.7× 17 0.2× 83 1.2× 44 2.2k
Emmanuel Chang United States 20 1.3k 0.9× 193 0.8× 60 0.5× 34 0.3× 110 1.5× 30 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Randy Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Randy Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Randy Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Randy Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Randy Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Randy Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Randy Lewis. The network helps show where Randy Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Randy Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Randy Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Randy Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Randy Lewis. Randy Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Atas, Y. Y., Mario Diaz, Xingxin Liu, et al.. (2025). The phase diagram of quantum chromodynamics in one dimension on a quantum computer. Nature Communications. 16(1). 10288–10288.
2.
Colquhoun, Brian, et al.. (2024). Improved analysis of strong-interaction-stable doubly bottom tetraquarks on the lattice. Physical review. D. 110(9). 6 indexed citations
3.
Lewis, Randy, et al.. (2023). Real time evolution and a traveling excitation in SU(2) pure gauge theory on a quantum computer.. Proceedings of The 39th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2022). 25–25. 3 indexed citations
4.
Atas, Y. Y., Jan F. Haase, Jinglei Zhang, et al.. (2023). Simulating one-dimensional quantum chromodynamics on a quantum computer: Real-time evolutions of tetra- and pentaquarks. Physical Review Research. 5(3). 38 indexed citations
5.
Atas, Y. Y., et al.. (2021). SU(2) hadrons on a quantum computer via a variational approach. Nature Communications. 12(1). 6499–6499. 90 indexed citations
6.
Maltman, Kim, P. A. Boyle, Renwick J. Hudspith, et al.. (2019). Current Status of inclusive hadronic tau determinations of |V_us|. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7 indexed citations
7.
Francis, Anthony, Renwick J. Hudspith, Randy Lewis, & Kim Maltman. (2018). More on heavy tetraquarks in lattice QCD at almost physical pion mass. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 4 indexed citations
8.
Boyle, Peter, Renwick J. Hudspith, Taku Izubuchi, et al.. (2018). Novel |Vus| Determination Using Inclusive Strange τ Decay and Lattice Hadronic Vacuum Polarization Functions. Physical Review Letters. 121(20). 202003–202003. 6 indexed citations
9.
Francis, Anthony, Renwick J. Hudspith, Randy Lewis, & Kim Maltman. (2017). Lattice Prediction for Deeply Bound Doubly Heavy Tetraquarks. Physical Review Letters. 118(14). 142001–142001. 139 indexed citations
10.
Blum, Tom, P. A. Boyle, Luigi Del Debbio, et al.. (2016). Lattice calculation of the leading strange quark-connected contribution to the muon g − 2. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2016(4). 1–20. 25 indexed citations
11.
Lewis, Randy, Anthony Francis, Renwick J. Hudspith, & Sean Tulin. (2016). dark matter from one-flavor SU(2) gauge theory. 227–227. 2 indexed citations
12.
Lewis, Randy, et al.. (2008). Exploring the meson spectrum with twisted mass lattice QCD. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 78(7). 10 indexed citations
13.
Borasoy, B., et al.. (2004). Finite volume effects using lattice chiral perturbation theory. 1 indexed citations
14.
Fleming, George, Frédéric Bonnet, Robert G. Edwards, Randy Lewis, & D.G. Richards. (2004). Pion form factor using domain wall valence and asqtad sea quarks. 2 indexed citations
15.
Lewis, Randy, Walter Wilcox, & R. M. Woloshyn. (2002). 1 Strange matrix elements of the nucleon. 1 indexed citations
16.
Perry, Elgin S., et al.. (2002). Modeling Possible Cooling-Water Intake System Impacts on Ohio River Fish Populations. The Scientific World JOURNAL. 2. 58–80. 6 indexed citations
17.
Lewis, Randy & R. M. Woloshyn. (2000). The charmed and bottom meson spectrum from lattice NRQCD. 1 indexed citations
18.
Lewis, Randy & R. M. Woloshyn. (2000). S- andP-wave heavy-light mesons in lattice nonrelativistic QCD. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 62(11). 46 indexed citations
19.
Lewis, Randy. (1998). 1 S-wave charmed mesons in lattice NRQCD. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations
20.
Sutherland, Mark, Bob Holdom, Sebastian Jaimungal, & Randy Lewis. (1995). What can a relativistic quark model tell us about charmed mesons?. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 51(9). 5053–5063. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026