Randy C. Miles

1.1k total citations
62 papers, 760 citations indexed

About

Randy C. Miles is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Randy C. Miles has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 760 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Oncology, 17 papers in General Health Professions and 13 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Randy C. Miles's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (39 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (13 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (11 papers). Randy C. Miles is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (39 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (13 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (11 papers). Randy C. Miles collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Puerto Rico. Randy C. Miles's co-authors include Constance D. Lehman, Anand K. Narayan, Regina Barzilay, Adam Yala, Tal Schuster, Efrén J. Flores, Christoph I. Lee, Tracy Onega, Grayson L. Baird and Judy C. Boughey and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Randy C. Miles

52 papers receiving 747 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Randy C. Miles United States 16 319 230 185 172 130 62 760
Alison Chetlen United States 16 124 0.4× 346 1.5× 52 0.3× 157 0.9× 75 0.6× 59 776
Brian N. Dontchos United States 15 180 0.6× 441 1.9× 263 1.4× 39 0.2× 205 1.6× 39 775
Jennifer Alford‐Teaster United States 17 382 1.2× 113 0.5× 39 0.2× 159 0.9× 104 0.8× 35 849
Carolyn Nickson Australia 16 470 1.5× 74 0.3× 137 0.7× 56 0.3× 151 1.2× 51 795
Katherine A. Klein United States 19 198 0.6× 477 2.1× 358 1.9× 52 0.3× 320 2.5× 48 1.1k
Sisse Helle Njor Denmark 24 1.6k 5.1× 164 0.7× 222 1.2× 85 0.5× 425 3.3× 90 2.0k
Louise S. Donnelly United Kingdom 21 723 2.3× 57 0.2× 113 0.6× 87 0.5× 116 0.9× 33 1.1k
Katherine Y. Tossas United States 9 285 0.9× 57 0.2× 55 0.3× 66 0.4× 152 1.2× 30 589
Elisabeth F. Beaber United States 18 803 2.5× 206 0.9× 350 1.9× 85 0.5× 456 3.5× 30 1.2k
Weranja Ranasinghe Australia 17 197 0.6× 56 0.2× 51 0.3× 59 0.3× 378 2.9× 68 890

Countries citing papers authored by Randy C. Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Randy C. Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Randy C. Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Randy C. Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Randy C. Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Randy C. Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Randy C. Miles. The network helps show where Randy C. Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Randy C. Miles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Randy C. Miles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Randy C. Miles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Randy C. Miles. Randy C. Miles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Flores, Efrén J., et al.. (2025). Application of the Socio-Ecological Model to Address Recruitment, Promotion, and Leadership Development of Women in Radiology. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 22(8). 953–960. 1 indexed citations
2.
Slanetz, Priscilla J., Anand K. Narayan, Lucy B. Spalluto, et al.. (2025). The Role of Radiology in Community Engagement. Radiographics. 45(8). e240185–e240185.
3.
Miles, Randy C., et al.. (2025). Sociodemographic Predictors of County-Level Mammography Screening Rates in the United States. Radiology Imaging Cancer. 7(6). e240433–e240433.
4.
Slanetz, Priscilla J., et al.. (2024). Assessing the Relationship between Radiology Department Research Funding and Institutional Community Inclusion and Investment. Radiology. 310(1). e231469–e231469. 1 indexed citations
5.
Watts, Jerome, et al.. (2024). The Association Between Food Security and Mammography Screening: Cross-Sectional Survey Results From the National Health Interview Survey. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 21(9). 1371–1379. 1 indexed citations
6.
Miles, Randy C., et al.. (2024). A How-to Guide for Community Breast Imaging Centers: Starting a Breast Imaging Fellowship. Journal of Breast Imaging. 7(2). 224–232.
7.
8.
O’Brien, Elizabeth, Karen Hampanda, Dulcy Wolverton, et al.. (2024). Interpretation of immediately released health information: Informing patient medical education in breast oncology. The American Journal of Surgery. 239. 115853–115853.
10.
Mango, Victoria L., et al.. (2023). Impact of High Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation on Access to Accredited Breast Imaging Screening and Diagnostic Facilities. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 20(7). 634–639. 10 indexed citations
11.
12.
Miles, Randy C., et al.. (2022). Impact of Health Care–Associated Cost Concerns on Mammography Utilization: Cross-Sectional Survey Results From the National Health Interview Survey. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 19(10). 1081–1087. 12 indexed citations
13.
Narayan, Anand K., et al.. (2022). Utilization of Screening Mammography in Women Before 50: Cross-Sectional Survey Results from the National Health Interview Survey. Academic Radiology. 30(6). 1101–1106. 2 indexed citations
14.
Miles, Randy C., et al.. (2021). Routine Breast Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Women Younger Than 50 Years: Current Paradigms Based on National Guidelines. PubMed. 35(3506). 320–323. 1 indexed citations
15.
Narayan, Anand K., et al.. (2020). Using CT Encounters to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Utilization: Cross-Sectional Survey Results From the National Health Interview Survey. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology. 50(3). 332–336. 3 indexed citations
16.
Panigrahi, Babita, et al.. (2020). Rare case of invasive lobular carcinoma in a male. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 15(6). 727–729. 1 indexed citations
17.
Miles, Randy C.. (2020). Closing the Gap: Disparities in Breast Cancer Mortality among African American Women. Radiology Imaging Cancer. 2(5). e200124–e200124. 9 indexed citations
18.
Wang, Gary X., et al.. (2020). Implementation and Utilization of a “Pink Card” Walk-In Screening Mammography Program Integrated With Physician Visits. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 17(12). 1602–1608. 19 indexed citations
19.
Miles, Randy C., Constance D. Lehman, Sarah Mercaldo, et al.. (2019). Obesity and breast cancer screening: Cross‐sectional survey results from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Cancer. 125(23). 4158–4163. 9 indexed citations
20.
Miles, Randy C., et al.. (2019). Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials Related to Breast Lesions Requiring Surgery. Radiology. 291(1). 112–118. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026