Rana N. El‐Danaf
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Neurology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Andrew D. HubermanPhong L. NguyenDenise M. PiscopoCristopher M. NiellOnkar S. DhandeWilliam GuidoThomas E. KraheEdward M. Callaway
- Topics
- Retinal Development and Disorders (12 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers)Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Arab EmiratesGermany
In The Last Decade
Rana N. El‐Danaf
17 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Molecular Biology 917
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 872
- Cognitive Neuroscience 542
- Ophthalmology 239
- Neurology 164
Countries citing papers authored by Rana N. El‐Danaf
This map shows the geographic impact of Rana N. El‐Danaf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rana N. El‐Danaf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rana N. El‐Danaf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rana N. El‐Danaf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rana N. El‐Danaf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rana N. El‐Danaf. The network helps show where Rana N. El‐Danaf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rana N. El‐Danaf
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rana N. El‐Danaf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rana N. El‐Danaf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rana N. El‐Danaf. Rana N. El‐Danaf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 125 | |
| 4 | 154 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 183 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 225 | |
| 11 | 60 | |
| 12 | Form and function of the three ON-type direction-selective retinal ganglion cells in the Hoxd10 mouse | 2 |
| 13 | 238 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 128 | |
| 16 | 63 | |
| 17 | 90 |
About Rana N. El‐Danaf
Rana N. El‐Danaf is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Aging and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (12 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (872 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (542 citations) and Ophthalmology (239 citations). Rana N. El‐Danaf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Arab Emirates and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andrew D. Huberman, Phong L. Nguyen, Denise M. Piscopo, Cristopher M. Niell, Onkar S. Dhande, William Guido, Thomas E. Krahe, Edward M. Callaway, Balaji Sriram and Alberto Cruz‐Martín. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Nature Communications and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.