R.A.M. Kengen

500 total citations
9 papers, 386 citations indexed

About

R.A.M. Kengen is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, R.A.M. Kengen has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 386 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in R.A.M. Kengen's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (4 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers). R.A.M. Kengen is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (4 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers). R.A.M. Kengen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and China. R.A.M. Kengen's co-authors include F.W.C. van der Ent, H.A.G. van der Pol, A. G. M. Hoofwijk, Esther M. Heuts, Karel W. E. Hulsewé, Margreet Th.E. Bink‐Boelkens, H. Schraffordt Koops, Nynke J. Elzenga, A. Postma and Willem A. Kamps and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, The American Journal of Cardiology and European Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

R.A.M. Kengen

9 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R.A.M. Kengen Netherlands 7 285 242 185 115 45 9 386
Claire Buchanan United States 8 301 1.1× 226 0.9× 196 1.1× 153 1.3× 85 1.9× 10 495
L.J. Pierce United States 6 319 1.1× 183 0.8× 113 0.6× 159 1.4× 83 1.8× 18 399
J.R. García-Talavera Fernández Italy 6 517 1.8× 388 1.6× 281 1.5× 149 1.3× 136 3.0× 9 609
Jacques R. Vilcoq France 4 323 1.1× 260 1.1× 143 0.8× 103 0.9× 20 0.4× 6 360
Fredrika Killander Sweden 12 240 0.8× 94 0.4× 47 0.3× 199 1.7× 63 1.4× 25 411
Sophie Lavertu Canada 6 183 0.6× 107 0.4× 104 0.6× 124 1.1× 44 1.0× 8 282
Laura Adkins United States 11 483 1.7× 287 1.2× 405 2.2× 427 3.7× 32 0.7× 14 671
Manabu Arai Japan 11 68 0.2× 75 0.3× 125 0.7× 190 1.7× 84 1.9× 14 358
Riccardo De Lellis Italy 8 438 1.5× 341 1.4× 194 1.0× 212 1.8× 43 1.0× 9 542
Daniela Tomei Italy 12 400 1.4× 337 1.4× 258 1.4× 153 1.3× 28 0.6× 21 497

Countries citing papers authored by R.A.M. Kengen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.A.M. Kengen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.A.M. Kengen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.A.M. Kengen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.A.M. Kengen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.A.M. Kengen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.A.M. Kengen. The network helps show where R.A.M. Kengen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.A.M. Kengen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.A.M. Kengen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.A.M. Kengen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R.A.M. Kengen. R.A.M. Kengen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
2.
Heuts, Esther M., F.W.C. van der Ent, R.A.M. Kengen, et al.. (2005). Results of sentinel node biopsy not affected by previous excisional biopsy. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 32(3). 278–281. 35 indexed citations
3.
Ent, F.W.C. van der, et al.. (2001). Halsted Revisited: Internal Mammary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer. Annals of Surgery. 234(1). 79–84. 158 indexed citations
4.
Ent, F.W.C. van der, R.A.M. Kengen, H.A.G. van der Pol, & A. G. M. Hoofwijk. (1999). Sentinel node biopsy in 70 unselected patients with breast cancer: increased feasibility by using 10 mCi radiocolloid in combination with a blue dye tracer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 25(1). 24–29. 100 indexed citations
5.
Blanksma, Paul K., et al.. (1997). Categorization of Abnormal Left Ventricular Function: Comparison Between Radionuclide Angiographic and Echocardiographic Technique in Postinfarction Patients. The American Journal of Cardiology. 79(1). 108–111. 2 indexed citations
6.
Postma, A., Margreet Th.E. Bink‐Boelkens, R.A.M. Kengen, et al.. (1996). Late cardiotoxicity after treatment for a malignant bone tumor. Medical and Pediatric Oncology. 26(4). 230–237. 41 indexed citations
7.
Kosterink, Jos G. W., Egbert F. Smit, D.A. Piers, et al.. (1996). Pharmacokinetics and scintigraphy of indium-111-DTPA-MOC-31 in small-cell lung carcinoma. Lung Cancer. 14(2-3). 386–386. 26 indexed citations
8.
Kengen, R.A.M., et al.. (1995). Iodine-131 Hippuran for the estimation of renal plasma flow: requirements for radiochemical purity. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 22(7). 678–681. 4 indexed citations
9.
Kosterink, Jos G. W., et al.. (1993). Radioimmunodetection of human small cell lung carcinoma xenografts in the nude rat using 111in-labelled monoclonal antibody MOC-31. European Journal of Cancer. 29(13). 1885–1890. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026