Ralf Stephan
About
In The Last Decade
Ralf Stephan
3 papers receiving 185 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Molecular Biology 125
- Pharmacology 48
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 43
- Plant Science 31
- Pharmacology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Ralf Stephan
This map shows the geographic impact of Ralf Stephan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ralf Stephan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ralf Stephan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ralf Stephan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ralf Stephan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ralf Stephan. The network helps show where Ralf Stephan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ralf Stephan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ralf Stephan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ralf Stephan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ralf Stephan. Ralf Stephan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | The LOTUS initiative for open knowledge management in natural products research breakdown → | 188 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.