Rajko Turk
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Topics
- Muscle activation and electromyography studies (11 papers)Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (6 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- SloveniaJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Rajko Turk
17 papers receiving 710 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Biomedical Engineering 564
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 216
- Rehabilitation 201
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 176
- Cognitive Neuroscience 164
Countries citing papers authored by Rajko Turk
This map shows the geographic impact of Rajko Turk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rajko Turk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rajko Turk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rajko Turk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rajko Turk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rajko Turk. The network helps show where Rajko Turk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rajko Turk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rajko Turk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rajko Turk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rajko Turk. Rajko Turk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 34 | |
| 3 | 71 | |
| 4 | FES gait restoration and balance control in spinal cord-injured patients. | 11 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 64 | |
| 7 | 69 | |
| 8 | Neurophysiological background of the use of functional electrical stimulation in paraplegia. | 15 |
| 9 | 52 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 95 | |
| 13 | Gait restoration in paraplegic patients: a feasibility demonstration using multichannel surface electrode FES. | 122 |
| 14 | 94 | |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | Electrical stimulation providing functional use of paraplegic patient muscles. | 71 |
About Rajko Turk
Rajko Turk is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 766 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (6 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (201 citations), Biomedical Engineering (564 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (216 citations). Rajko Turk has collaborated with scholars based in Slovenia, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tadej Bajd, A. Kralj, H. Benko, J Krajnik, Aneta Stefanovska, L. Vodovnik, M. A. M. Turk, R. Karba and Marko Munih. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Journal of Biomechanics and Physical Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.