Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Copper bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and tolerance in plants: A comprehensive review
2020382 citationsVinod Kumar, Shevita Pandita et al.Chemosphereprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Raj Setia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raj Setia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raj Setia more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raj Setia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raj Setia. The network helps show where Raj Setia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raj Setia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raj Setia.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raj Setia based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Raj Setia. Raj Setia is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Setia, Raj, et al.. (2007). Dynamics of forms of inorganic phosphorus during wheat growth in a continuous maize-wheat cropping system. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 55(2). 139–146.14 indexed citations
14.
Setia, Raj, et al.. (2007). Pedospheric distribution of micronutrient cations in soils developed on various landforms in North-east Punjab. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 55(4). 515–520.3 indexed citations
15.
Sharma, Pramod Kumar, et al.. (2006). Use of information technology for mapping of DTPA-extractable micronutrients in soils of Amritsar District, Punjab. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 54(4). 465–474.6 indexed citations
16.
Setia, Raj, et al.. (2005). Sulphur adsorption by soil after differential fertilization for twenty-two years with NPK under a continuous maize-wheat cropping system. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 53(3). 417–420.2 indexed citations
17.
Setia, Raj, et al.. (2005). Effect of long-term differential fertilization on depth-distribution of forms of sulphur and their relationship with sulphur nutrition of wheat under maize-wheat sequence. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 53(1). 91–96.6 indexed citations
18.
Setia, Raj, et al.. (2004). Vertical distribution of chemical pools of potassium and their relationship with potassium nutrition of wheat under long-term differential fertilization. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 52(4). 469–472.4 indexed citations
19.
Setia, Raj, et al.. (2004). Sulphur regime of an Arable Soil (Typic ustrochrept) under long-term differential fertilization at various growth stages of wheat. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 52(2). 150–155.1 indexed citations
20.
Singh, Jai & Raj Setia. (1974). The germination of different qualities of soybean seeds under varying storage conditions. 12(1). 3–10.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.