Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture
20071.8k citationsPete Smith, M. Wattenbach et al.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciencesprofile →
A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments
1997892 citationsPete Smith, Jo Smith et al.profile →
Similar response of labile and resistant soil organic matter pools to changes in temperature
2005618 citationsPete Smith, Jo Smith et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Smith. The network helps show where Jo Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jo Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jo Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jo Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jo Smith. Jo Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smith, Jo, et al.. (2016). Evaluation of Alternative Soil Amendments and Response to Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Productivity in Ada'a District, Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of environment and earth science. 6(3). 158–168.1 indexed citations
8.
Hergoualc’h, Kristell, et al.. (2014). Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Soil Properties in Intact and Disturbed Tropical Peatlands of Indonesia. 157–157.1 indexed citations
Baggs, Elizabeth M., et al.. (2008). Anaerobic Methane Oxidation in Soils - revealed using 13C-labelled methane tracers. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2008.1 indexed citations
Falloon, Pete, Philip N. Smith, József Szabó, et al.. (1999). Linking GIS and dynamic simulation models: estimating the regional carbon sequestration potential of agricultural management options. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 133(3). 341–342.1 indexed citations
17.
Glendining, M. J., Nick Bailey, Jo Smith, T. M. Addiscott, & Pete Smith. (1998). SUNDIAL-FRS user guide, version 1.0. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository).1 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Pete, D. S. Powlson, Jo Smith, & Pete Falloon. (1997). SOMNET. A global network and database of soil organic matter models and long-term experimental datasets. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 38. 4–5.8 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Jo, M. J. Glendining, & Pete Smith. (1997). The use of computer simulation models to optimise the use of nitrogen in whole farm systems. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 50. 147–154.3 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Jo & M. J. Glendining. (1996). A decision support system for optimising the use of nitrogen in crop rotations. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.