Raj K. Chadha
- Organic Chemistry top 1%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology top 5%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- John E. DrakeJuan R. GranjaDuncan E. McReeKenji KobayashiM. Reza GhadiriDennis G. TuckDavid N. HendricksonRavi Shankar
- Topics
- Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (26 papers)Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (20 papers)Crystal structures of chemical compounds (15 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyAngewandte Chemie International EditionJournal of The Electrochemical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaIndia
In The Last Decade
Raj K. Chadha
106 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Organic Chemistry 1.6k
- Inorganic Chemistry 849
- Molecular Biology 524
- Oncology 480
- Materials Chemistry 468
Countries citing papers authored by Raj K. Chadha
This map shows the geographic impact of Raj K. Chadha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raj K. Chadha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raj K. Chadha more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raj K. Chadha
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raj K. Chadha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raj K. Chadha. The network helps show where Raj K. Chadha may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raj K. Chadha
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raj K. Chadha. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raj K. Chadha based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Raj K. Chadha. Raj K. Chadha is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 93 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 45 | |
| 10 | 88 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 64 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Raj K. Chadha
Raj K. Chadha is a scholar working on Toxicology, Inorganic Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 106 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (26 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (20 papers) and Crystal structures of chemical compounds (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (849 citations), Organic Chemistry (1.6k citations) and Toxicology (164 citations). Raj K. Chadha has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and India. Frequent co-authors include John E. Drake, Juan R. Granja, Duncan E. McRee, Kenji Kobayashi, M. Reza Ghadiri, Dennis G. Tuck, David N. Hendrickson, Ravi Shankar, Rajesh Kumar and Suraj P. Narula. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Journal of The Electrochemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.