Rachel Wooliver

457 total citations
18 papers, 323 citations indexed

About

Rachel Wooliver is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Wooliver has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 323 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Plant Science, 8 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 7 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Rachel Wooliver's work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers). Rachel Wooliver is often cited by papers focused on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers). Rachel Wooliver collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Rachel Wooliver's co-authors include Jennifer A. Schweitzer, Joseph K. Bailey, Sindhu Jagadamma, Seema N. Sheth, Alix A. Pfennigwerth, Michael E. Van Nuland, Ian M. Ware, Silas Tittes, James A. Fordyce and Quentin D. Read and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecology and Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Wooliver

17 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachel Wooliver United States 12 139 116 104 90 82 18 323
Ian M. Ware United States 10 168 1.2× 178 1.5× 111 1.1× 56 0.6× 85 1.0× 15 348
Sofia J. van Moorsel Switzerland 10 143 1.0× 109 0.9× 85 0.8× 48 0.5× 135 1.6× 19 328
Noëlline Tsafack France 10 127 0.9× 114 1.0× 114 1.1× 68 0.8× 103 1.3× 27 361
Gerhard Boenisch Germany 8 141 1.0× 96 0.8× 79 0.8× 70 0.8× 103 1.3× 12 327
Jake J. Grossman United States 11 103 0.7× 173 1.5× 91 0.9× 49 0.5× 111 1.4× 23 389
Helena Castro Portugal 11 176 1.3× 182 1.6× 142 1.4× 62 0.7× 90 1.1× 20 404
Lucie Mahaut France 12 185 1.3× 171 1.5× 167 1.6× 47 0.5× 78 1.0× 20 402
W. G. Lee New Zealand 10 133 1.0× 185 1.6× 135 1.3× 47 0.5× 77 0.9× 14 339
Rafael Otfinowski Canada 10 122 0.9× 201 1.7× 114 1.1× 37 0.4× 134 1.6× 16 312
Nianxun Xi China 11 192 1.4× 161 1.4× 81 0.8× 114 1.3× 79 1.0× 23 356

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Wooliver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Wooliver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Wooliver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Wooliver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Wooliver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Wooliver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Wooliver. The network helps show where Rachel Wooliver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Wooliver

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Wooliver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Wooliver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Wooliver. Rachel Wooliver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Wooliver, Rachel, Stephanie N. Kivlin, & Sindhu Jagadamma. (2025). Microbial communities and their association with soil health indicators under row cash crop and cover crop diversification: a case study. Frontiers in Microbiology. 16. 1664417–1664417.
2.
Walker, Emily, Rachel Wooliver, Laura Russo, & Sindhu Jagadamma. (2024). The context‐dependent benefits of organic farming on pollinator biodiversity: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology. 62(1). 41–52. 3 indexed citations
3.
Wooliver, Rachel & Sindhu Jagadamma. (2023). Response of soil organic carbon fractions to cover cropping: A meta-analysis of agroecosystems. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 351. 108497–108497. 42 indexed citations
4.
Wooliver, Rachel, et al.. (2022). Populations of western North American monkeyflowers accrue niche breadth primarily via genotypic divergence in environmental optima. Ecology and Evolution. 12(10). e9434–e9434. 1 indexed citations
5.
Wooliver, Rachel, et al.. (2022). The evolution of thermal performance in native and invasive populations of Mimulus guttatus. Evolution Letters. 6(2). 136–148. 14 indexed citations
6.
Wooliver, Rachel, Stephanie N. Kivlin, & Sindhu Jagadamma. (2022). Links Among Crop Diversification, Microbial Diversity, and Soil Organic Carbon: Mini Review and Case Studies. Frontiers in Microbiology. 13. 854247–854247. 14 indexed citations
7.
Wooliver, Rachel, et al.. (2022). A viewpoint on ecological and evolutionary study of plant thermal performance curves in a warming world. AoB Plants. 14(3). plac016–plac016. 13 indexed citations
8.
9.
Wooliver, Rachel, Silas Tittes, & Seema N. Sheth. (2020). A resurrection study reveals limited evolution of thermal performance in response to recent climate change across the geographic range of the scarlet monkeyflower. Evolution. 74(8). 1699–1710. 27 indexed citations
10.
Wooliver, Rachel, Adam F. A. Pellegrini, Bonnie G. Waring, et al.. (2019). Changing perspectives on terrestrial nitrogen cycling: The importance of weathering and evolved resource‐use traits for understanding ecosystem responses to global change. Functional Ecology. 33(10). 1818–1829. 16 indexed citations
11.
Wooliver, Rachel, et al.. (2018). Soil fungi underlie a phylogenetic pattern in plant growth responses to nitrogen enrichment. Journal of Ecology. 106(6). 2161–2175. 9 indexed citations
12.
Potts, BM, Julianne M. O’Reilly-Wapstra, Andrew Bissett, et al.. (2018). Phylogenetic trait conservatism predicts patterns of plant‐soil feedback. Ecosphere. 9(10). 11 indexed citations
13.
Ware, Ian M., Connor R. Fitzpatrick, Rachel Wooliver, et al.. (2018). Feedbacks link ecosystem ecology and evolution across spatial and temporal scales: Empirical evidence and future directions. Functional Ecology. 33(1). 31–42. 21 indexed citations
14.
Wooliver, Rachel, et al.. (2017). Phylogeny is a powerful tool for predicting plant biomass responses to nitrogen enrichment. Ecology. 98(8). 2120–2132. 14 indexed citations
15.
Nuland, Michael E. Van, Rachel Wooliver, Alix A. Pfennigwerth, et al.. (2016). Plant–soil feedbacks: connecting ecosystem ecology and evolution. Functional Ecology. 30(7). 1032–1042. 81 indexed citations
16.
Potts, BM, Noel W. Davies, Rachel Wooliver, et al.. (2016). Phylogeny Explains Variation in The Root Chemistry of Eucalyptus Species. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 42(10). 1086–1097. 22 indexed citations
17.
Wooliver, Rachel, Alix A. Pfennigwerth, Joseph K. Bailey, & Jennifer A. Schweitzer. (2016). Plant functional constraints guide macroevolutionary trade‐offs in competitive and conservative growth responses to nitrogen. Functional Ecology. 30(7). 1099–1108. 27 indexed citations
18.
Wooliver, Rachel, Jennifer A. Schweitzer, Julianne M. O’Reilly-Wapstra, et al.. (2014). Evolutionary History and Novel Biotic Interactions Determine Plant Responses to Elevated CO2 and Nitrogen Fertilization. PLoS ONE. 9(12). e114596–e114596. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026