Rachel Reed

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
34 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Rachel Reed is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Reed has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 9 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 8 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Rachel Reed's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (16 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (8 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (5 papers). Rachel Reed is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (16 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (8 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (5 papers). Rachel Reed collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Chile. Rachel Reed's co-authors include Christian Inglis, Rachael Sharman, Wallgren Ei, Margaret Barnes, Lauren Kearney, Jennifer Rowe, Chris Gilleard, Margaret McAllister, Jennene Greenhill and Wendy Madsen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Reed

34 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

TRANSPLANTATION OF EMBRYONIC DOPAMINE NEURONS FOR SEVERE ... 2001 2026 2009 2017 2001 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachel Reed Australia 13 480 398 306 294 216 34 1.3k
Kerstin Strömland Sweden 27 86 0.2× 417 1.0× 154 0.5× 223 0.8× 45 0.2× 62 2.3k
Simona Orcesi Italy 28 88 0.2× 1.1k 2.8× 108 0.4× 102 0.3× 30 0.1× 121 2.5k
Daniela Chieffo Italy 20 302 0.6× 151 0.4× 173 0.6× 20 0.1× 19 0.1× 45 1.7k
Ntinos C. Myrianthopoulos United States 28 203 0.4× 471 1.2× 142 0.5× 211 0.7× 17 0.1× 60 2.3k
Michael Wong Canada 15 252 0.5× 386 1.0× 40 0.1× 16 0.1× 446 2.1× 42 1.3k
Kai Eriksson Finland 23 196 0.4× 97 0.2× 120 0.4× 40 0.1× 18 0.1× 62 1.7k
Monica Bucci United States 17 86 0.2× 170 0.4× 135 0.4× 9 0.0× 134 0.6× 29 2.0k
Daniela Ricci Italy 28 74 0.2× 179 0.4× 91 0.3× 56 0.2× 20 0.1× 87 2.5k
Emily G. Allen United States 28 114 0.2× 1.1k 2.9× 33 0.1× 54 0.2× 26 0.1× 73 2.9k
Claire O. Leonard United States 20 154 0.3× 394 1.0× 117 0.4× 8 0.0× 712 3.3× 34 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Reed. The network helps show where Rachel Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Reed

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Reed. Rachel Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Skariah, Annie, Rachel Reed, Svetlana Dambaeva, et al.. (2022). Post-hoc evaluation of peripheral blood natural killer cell cytotoxicity in predicting the risk of recurrent pregnancy losses and repeated implantation failures. Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 150. 103487–103487. 12 indexed citations
3.
Kearney, Lauren, et al.. (2021). Validating a scale to measure respectful maternity care in Australia: Challenges and recommendations. Midwifery. 103. 103090–103090. 12 indexed citations
4.
Reed, Rachel, et al.. (2019). Playing in the Borderlands: The Transformative Possibilities of Queering Music Therapy Pedagogy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 19(3). 14 indexed citations
5.
Lord, Bill, et al.. (2019). Women’s experience of unplanned out-of-hospital birth in paramedic care. BMC Emergency Medicine. 19(1). 54–54. 10 indexed citations
6.
Lord, Bill, et al.. (2019). Listening to women’s voices: the experience of giving birth with paramedic care in Queensland, Australia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 19(1). 10 indexed citations
7.
Kearney, Lauren, Rachel Reed, Mary Kynn, Jeanine Young, & Lisa Davenport. (2019). Third stage of labour management practices: A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of Australian women and their associated outcomes. Midwifery. 75. 110–116. 2 indexed citations
8.
Reed, Rachel, et al.. (2019). Birthing the placenta: women’s decisions and experiences. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 19(1). 140–140. 4 indexed citations
9.
Reed, Rachel, Rachael Sharman, & Christian Inglis. (2017). Women’s descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 17(1). 21–21. 189 indexed citations
10.
Kearney, Lauren, Mary Kynn, Alison Craswell, & Rachel Reed. (2017). The relationship between midwife-led group-based versus conventional antenatal care and mode of birth: a matched cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 17(1). 39–39. 8 indexed citations
11.
Craswell, Alison, Lauren Kearney, & Rachel Reed. (2016). ‘Expecting and Connecting’ Group Pregnancy Care: Evaluation of a collaborative clinic. Women and Birth. 29(5). 416–422. 21 indexed citations
12.
Inglis, Christian, Rachael Sharman, & Rachel Reed. (2016). Paternal mental health following perceived traumatic childbirth. Midwifery. 41. 125–131. 32 indexed citations
13.
Reed, Rachel, Margaret Barnes, & Jennifer Rowe. (2016). Women’s Experience of Birth: Childbirth as a Rite of Passage. International Journal of Childbirth. 6(1). 46–56. 21 indexed citations
14.
Reed, Rachel, Jennifer Rowe, & Margaret Barnes. (2016). Midwifery practice during birth: Ritual companionship. Women and Birth. 29(3). 269–278. 21 indexed citations
15.
Reed, Rachel, et al.. (2014). Destabilizing Bodies, Destabilizing Disciplines: Practicing Liminality in Music Therapy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 14(3). 13 indexed citations
16.
Barnes, Margaret, et al.. (2010). Evaluation of a Practice-Development Initiative to Improve Breastfeeding Rates. The Journal of Perinatal Education. 19(4). 17–23. 13 indexed citations
17.
Reed, Rachel, et al.. (2010). Birth: an evidence-based approach. Journal of Paramedic Practice. 2(1). 6–11. 1 indexed citations
18.
Hauser, R., et al.. (2009). P2.109 Piclozotan reduces dyskinesia and OFF time in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with L-dopa induced motor complications. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 15. S118–S118. 5 indexed citations
19.
McAllister, Margaret, et al.. (2009). Teaching nursing’s history: A national survey of Australian Schools of Nursing, 2007–2008. Nurse Education Today. 30(4). 370–375. 19 indexed citations
20.
Madsen, Wendy, et al.. (2009). Nursing’s orphans: How the system of nursing education in Australia is undermining professional identity. Contemporary Nurse. 32(1-2). 9–18. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026