Rachel O. Coats

521 total citations
35 papers, 361 citations indexed

About

Rachel O. Coats is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel O. Coats has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 361 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Rachel O. Coats's work include Motor Control and Adaptation (14 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (6 papers). Rachel O. Coats is often cited by papers focused on Motor Control and Adaptation (14 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (6 papers). Rachel O. Coats collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Indonesia. Rachel O. Coats's co-authors include Geoffrey P. Bingham, Mark Mon‐Williams, John P. Wann, Winona Snapp‐Childs, Andrew D. Wilson, Jing Pan, Sarah Astill, Melanie Rose Burke, Judith Johnson and Deborah Hill and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Rachel O. Coats

30 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachel O. Coats United Kingdom 11 271 117 69 37 35 35 361
Leigh A. Mrotek United States 12 300 1.1× 52 0.4× 80 1.2× 44 1.2× 27 0.8× 25 393
Monica Biggio Italy 10 181 0.7× 107 0.9× 43 0.6× 73 2.0× 19 0.5× 31 290
Kristie Nemeth United States 5 199 0.7× 185 1.6× 37 0.5× 55 1.5× 45 1.3× 7 347
Nobuyuki Inui Japan 12 313 1.2× 129 1.1× 143 2.1× 71 1.9× 19 0.5× 49 409
Guilherme Augusto Zimeo Morais Brazil 10 273 1.0× 70 0.6× 147 2.1× 25 0.7× 21 0.6× 12 536
Cédric Meckler France 11 286 1.1× 57 0.5× 67 1.0× 22 0.6× 11 0.3× 17 364
Pauline M. Hilt France 12 203 0.7× 110 0.9× 61 0.9× 32 0.9× 14 0.4× 23 251
Jan M. Hondzinski United States 12 167 0.6× 57 0.5× 84 1.2× 28 0.8× 49 1.4× 30 369
Mathieu Gueugnon France 12 111 0.4× 99 0.8× 83 1.2× 16 0.4× 23 0.7× 25 301
Stéphanie Rossit United Kingdom 14 436 1.6× 74 0.6× 24 0.3× 16 0.4× 32 0.9× 35 546

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel O. Coats

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel O. Coats's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel O. Coats with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel O. Coats more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel O. Coats

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel O. Coats. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel O. Coats. The network helps show where Rachel O. Coats may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel O. Coats

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel O. Coats. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel O. Coats based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel O. Coats. Rachel O. Coats is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Coats, Rachel O., et al.. (2025). Monocular blur impairs heading judgements from optic flow. i-Perception. 16(1). 1274098076–1274098076.
2.
Coats, Rachel O., et al.. (2024). A novel tool for characterising upper limb function in progressive multiple sclerosis through kinematic assessment. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 462. 123068–123068.
3.
Johnson, Judith, et al.. (2024). Life satisfaction and its associated factors among young and older adults in the United Kingdom (UK). Aging & Mental Health. 29(4). 687–695. 3 indexed citations
5.
Coats, Rachel O., et al.. (2024). What Does It Mean to “Age Well” Among British and Javanese Older Adults? A Cross-Cultural Qualitative Study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 79(7). 3 indexed citations
6.
Coats, Rachel O., et al.. (2021). Attitudes Towards Assisted Dying in Dementia: A Focus Group Study with Younger and Older Adults. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying. 88(3). 1051–1067.
7.
Coats, Rachel O., et al.. (2021). The role of the posterior parietal cortex on cognition: An exploratory study. Brain Research. 1764. 147452–147452. 5 indexed citations
8.
Coats, Rachel O., et al.. (2020). Following Instructions in Working Memory: Do Older Adults Show the Enactment Advantage?. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 76(4). 703–710. 7 indexed citations
9.
Coats, Rachel O., Kirsty Crossley, Jianhua Wu, et al.. (2020). Cognitive and sensorimotor function in participants being treated for trigeminal neuralgia pain. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 21(1). 91–91. 7 indexed citations
10.
Anderson, Anna, et al.. (2019). The effect of using a cycling workstation on mouse dexterity. PLoS ONE. 14(8). e0220896–e0220896. 3 indexed citations
11.
Coats, Rachel O., et al.. (2018). The effect of task symmetry on bimanual reach-to-grasp movements after cervical spinal cord injury. Experimental Brain Research. 236(11). 3101–3111. 4 indexed citations
12.
Coats, Rachel O., Raymond Holt, Geoffrey P. Bingham, & Mark Mon‐Williams. (2018). Predicting the duration of reach-to-grasp movements to objects with asymmetric contact surfaces. PLoS ONE. 13(2). e0193185–e0193185. 1 indexed citations
13.
Shire, Katy, et al.. (2016). The effect of standing desks on manual control in children and young adults. Gait & Posture. 48. 42–46. 5 indexed citations
14.
Coats, Rachel O., et al.. (2015). Multisensory integration in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. Human Movement Science. 43. 15–22. 6 indexed citations
15.
Coats, Rachel O., et al.. (2014). The 50s Cliff: Perceptuo-Motor Learning Rates across the Lifespan. PLoS ONE. 9(1). e85758–e85758. 22 indexed citations
16.
Bingham, Geoffrey P., et al.. (2014). A geometric and dynamic affordance model of reaches-to-grasp: Men take greater risks than women.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 40(4). 1542–1550. 5 indexed citations
17.
Pan, Jing, Rachel O. Coats, & Geoffrey P. Bingham. (2013). Calibration is action specific but perturbation of perceptual units is not.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 40(1). 404–415. 18 indexed citations
18.
Coats, Rachel O., Jing Pan, & Geoffrey P. Bingham. (2013). Perturbation of perceptual units reveals dominance hierarchy in cross calibration.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 40(1). 328–341. 13 indexed citations
19.
Coats, Rachel O. & John P. Wann. (2011). The reliance on visual feedback control by older adults is highlighted in tasks requiring precise endpoint placement and precision grip. Experimental Brain Research. 214(1). 139–150. 25 indexed citations
20.
Coats, Rachel O., Geoffrey P. Bingham, & Mark Mon‐Williams. (2008). Calibrating grasp size and reach distance: interactions reveal integral organization of reaching-to-grasp movements. Experimental Brain Research. 189(2). 211–220. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026