Rachel Newton
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Andrew C. MartinPaul StevensonMark I. McCarthyLada TimotijevićDaniela F. CoutinhoFederico NeresiniMonique RaatsAlie de Boer
- Topics
- COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers)Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Rachel Newton
10 papers receiving 205 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Clinical Psychology 128
- Sociology and Political Science 56
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 37
- Psychiatry and Mental health 28
- General Health Professions 17
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Newton
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Newton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Newton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Newton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Newton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Newton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Newton. The network helps show where Rachel Newton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Newton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Newton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Newton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Newton. Rachel Newton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 135 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | Restoration Science in New York Harbor: It takes a (large, diverse and engaged) village | 1 |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS DANCE IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION | 2 |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | Community Assets First: The implications of the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach for the Coalition agenda | 2 |
About Rachel Newton
Rachel Newton is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Speech and Hearing and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 10 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers) and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (128 citations), Business and International Management (4 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (28 citations). Rachel Newton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew C. Martin, Paul Stevenson, Mark I. McCarthy, Lada Timotijević, Daniela F. Coutinho, Federico Neresini, Monique Raats, Alie de Boer, João Breda and Gene Rowe. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Disease in Childhood, International Journal of Eating Disorders and Food Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.