Rachel McArdle

4.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
40 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Rachel McArdle is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel McArdle has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 papers in Speech and Hearing and 12 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Rachel McArdle's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (25 papers), Noise Effects and Management (17 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (12 papers). Rachel McArdle is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (25 papers), Noise Effects and Management (17 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (12 papers). Rachel McArdle collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Italy. Rachel McArdle's co-authors include Richard H. Wilson, Harvey B. Abrams, Theresa H. Chisolm, Patrick J. Doyle, William H. Martin, Sharon A. Sandridge, James A. Henry, Stephen M. Nagler, Sam E. Kinney and Robert L. Folmer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Progress in brain research and Ear and Hearing.

In The Last Decade

Rachel McArdle

39 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

The Tinnitus Functional Index 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachel McArdle United States 19 1.1k 885 527 386 143 40 1.5k
Harvey B. Abrams United States 18 1.6k 1.5× 1.1k 1.3× 792 1.5× 444 1.2× 330 2.3× 38 2.0k
Philip Newall Australia 19 1.7k 1.6× 1.2k 1.4× 940 1.8× 373 1.0× 273 1.9× 39 2.2k
Theresa H. Chisolm United States 23 1.5k 1.4× 810 0.9× 1.0k 2.0× 123 0.3× 345 2.4× 57 1.9k
Adele M. Goman United States 14 1.1k 1.0× 749 0.8× 778 1.5× 175 0.5× 141 1.0× 31 1.5k
Dona M. P. Jayakody Australia 17 884 0.8× 518 0.6× 606 1.1× 108 0.3× 98 0.7× 49 1.1k
K. Jonas Brännström Sweden 20 827 0.7× 343 0.4× 500 0.9× 94 0.2× 246 1.7× 85 1.1k
Alessandra Giannella Samelli Brazil 16 604 0.5× 389 0.4× 365 0.7× 125 0.3× 140 1.0× 97 1.0k
Kátia de Freitas Alvarenga Brazil 18 630 0.6× 458 0.5× 236 0.4× 93 0.2× 164 1.1× 107 907
Ira M. Ventry United States 16 1.7k 1.5× 934 1.1× 1.1k 2.1× 150 0.4× 449 3.1× 35 2.2k
Brasília Maria Chiari Brazil 18 292 0.3× 109 0.1× 247 0.5× 54 0.1× 311 2.2× 114 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel McArdle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel McArdle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel McArdle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel McArdle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel McArdle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel McArdle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel McArdle. The network helps show where Rachel McArdle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel McArdle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel McArdle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel McArdle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel McArdle. Rachel McArdle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fahy, Frances, et al.. (2024). Co-creating a community visioning methodology for energy transitions: Principles, practices, and reflections. Energy Research & Social Science. 118. 103783–103783. 4 indexed citations
2.
McArdle, Rachel. (2023). Liquid urbanisms: Framing the intrinsic fluidity of the urban. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10(1). 2 indexed citations
3.
4.
McArdle, Rachel, et al.. (2019). Supporting Women in Geography (SWIG) Ireland: Confronting the role of gender and asserting the importance of the female voice. Irish Geography. 52(1). 101–104. 2 indexed citations
5.
McArdle, Rachel, et al.. (2019). Supporting Women in Geography (SWIG) Ireland: Confronting the role of gender and asserting the importance of the female voice. Irish Geography. 52(1). 101–104. 1 indexed citations
6.
Till, Karen E. & Rachel McArdle. (2016). The Improvisional City: Valuing urbanity beyond the chimera of permanence. Irish Geography. 48(1). 37–68. 22 indexed citations
7.
Wilson, Richard H. & Rachel McArdle. (2015). The Homogeneity with Respect to Intelligibility of Recorded Word-Recognition Materials. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 26(4). 331–345. 10 indexed citations
8.
Abrams, Harvey B., et al.. (2012). Initial-Fit Approach Versus Verified Prescription: Comparing Self-Perceived Hearing Aid Benefit. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 23(10). 768–778. 52 indexed citations
9.
Henry, James A., Barbara Stewart, Harvey B. Abrams, et al.. (2011). The Tinnitus Functional Index. Ear and Hearing. 33(2). 153–176. 576 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Wilson, Richard H., et al.. (2010). Word-Recognition Performance in Interrupted Noise by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and Older Listeners with Hearing Loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 21(2). 90–109. 17 indexed citations
11.
Wilson, Richard H., Rachel McArdle, & Heidi Roberts. (2008). A Comparison of Recognition Performances in Speech-Spectrum Noise by Listeners with Normal Hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU‐6, W-1 Spondaic Words, and Monosyllabic Digits Spoken by the Same Speaker. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 19(6). 496–506. 23 indexed citations
12.
Chisolm, Theresa H., et al.. (2007). Connecting the hearing-impaired in a wireless world. The Hearing Journal. 60(11). 37–44. 1 indexed citations
13.
Wilson, Richard H. & Rachel McArdle. (2007). Intra- and Inter-session Test, Retest Reliability of the Words-in-Noise (WIN) Test. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 18(10). 813–825. 58 indexed citations
14.
Chisolm, Theresa H., et al.. (2007). Evidence for the Use of Hearing Assistive Technology by Adults: The Role of the FM System. PubMed. 11(2). 73–89. 38 indexed citations
15.
McArdle, Rachel, Theresa H. Chisolm, Harvey B. Abrams, Richard H. Wilson, & Patrick J. Doyle. (2005). The WHO-DAS II: Measuring Outcomes of Hearing Aid Intervention for Adults. PubMed. 9(3). 127–143. 62 indexed citations
16.
Chisolm, Theresa H., Harvey B. Abrams, Rachel McArdle, Richard H. Wilson, & Patrick J. Doyle. (2005). The WHO-DAS II: Psychometric Properties in the Measurement of Functional Health Status in Adults With Acquired Hearing Loss. PubMed. 9(3). 111–126. 113 indexed citations
17.
Abrams, Harvey B., Rachel McArdle, & Theresa H. Chisolm. (2005). From Outcomes to Evidence: Establishing Best Practices for Audiologists. Seminars in Hearing. 26(3). 157–169. 5 indexed citations
18.
Wilson, Richard H. & Rachel McArdle. (2005). Speech signals used to evaluate functional status of the auditory system. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 42(4s). 79–79. 80 indexed citations
19.
McArdle, Rachel, Harvey B. Abrams, & Theresa H. Chisolm. (2005). When Hearing Aids Go Bad: An FM Success Story. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 16(10). 809–821. 2 indexed citations
20.
Chisolm, Theresa H., et al.. (2004). Goals and outcomes of FM use by adults. The Hearing Journal. 57(11). 28–35. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026