Rachel McArdle
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Sensory Systems top 0.2%
- Speech and Hearing top 0.5%
- Neurology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Richard H. WilsonHarvey B. AbramsTheresa H. ChisolmPatrick J. DoyleJames A. HenryWilliam H. MartinSharon A. SandridgeRobert L. Folmer
- Topics
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (25 papers)Noise Effects and Management (17 papers)Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (12 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaProgress in brain researchEar and Hearing
- Partner nations
- United StatesIrelandItaly
In The Last Decade
Rachel McArdle
39 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
- Sensory Systems 885
- Speech and Hearing 527
- Neurology 386
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 143
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel McArdle
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel McArdle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel McArdle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel McArdle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel McArdle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel McArdle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel McArdle. The network helps show where Rachel McArdle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel McArdle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel McArdle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel McArdle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel McArdle. Rachel McArdle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 52 | |
| 10 | The Tinnitus Functional Indexbreakdown → | 576 |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 58 | |
| 15 | 39 | |
| 16 | 62 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 80 | |
| 19 | 87 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Rachel McArdle
Rachel McArdle is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Sensory Systems and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (25 papers), Noise Effects and Management (17 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (885 citations), Speech and Hearing (527 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations). Rachel McArdle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Richard H. Wilson, Harvey B. Abrams, Theresa H. Chisolm, Patrick J. Doyle, James A. Henry, William H. Martin, Sharon A. Sandridge, Robert L. Folmer, Barbara Stewart and Sam E. Kinney. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Progress in brain research and Ear and Hearing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.