Philip Newall

2.9k total citations
39 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Philip Newall is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Newall has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 papers in Sensory Systems and 12 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Philip Newall's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (29 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (14 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (12 papers). Philip Newall is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (29 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (14 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (12 papers). Philip Newall collaborates with scholars based in Australia, China and Malaysia. Philip Newall's co-authors include Maryanne Golding, Elena Rochtchina, Paul Mitchell, Doungkamol Sindhusake, George Rubin, Jie Jin Wang, David Hartley, Paul Mitchell, Harvey Dillon and Paul Mitchell and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Epidemiology, Neuroreport and Clinical Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Philip Newall

38 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Philip Newall

NEURO

DEP

Harvey B. Abrams United States

Theresa H. Chisolm United States

Mark Edmondson‐Jones United Kingdom

Theo S. Kapteyn Netherlands

Sheila R. Pratt United States

Ted S. Tweed United States

Ira M. Ventry United States

Gary P. Jacobson United States

Maryanne Golding Australia

Adele M. Goman United States

Harvey B. Abrams United States

Philip Newall

1.6k ×0.9

1.1k ×0.9

792 ×0.8

444 ×1.2

NEURO

330 ×1.2

DEP

Citations per year, relative to Philip Newall Philip Newall (= 1×) peers Harvey B. Abrams

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Newall

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Newall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Newall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Newall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Newall

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Newall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Newall. The network helps show where Philip Newall may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Newall

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Newall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Newall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Newall. Philip Newall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Ching, Teresa Y. C., et al.. (2013). Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss. International Journal of Audiology. 52(5). 322–332. 11 indexed citations

Wang, Shuo, Robert Mannell, Philip Newall, & Demin Han. (2010). Contribution of Spectral Cues to Mandarin Lexical Tone Recognition in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Mandarin Chinese Speakers. Ear and Hearing. 32(1). 97–103. 12 indexed citations

Hartley, David, Elena Rochtchina, Philip Newall, Maryanne Golding, & Paul Mitchell. (2010). Use of Hearing Aids and Assistive Listening Devices in an Older Australian Population. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 21(10). 642–653. 156 indexed citations

Han, Demin, Shuo Wang, Hua Zhang, et al.. (2009). Development of Mandarin monosyllabic speech test materials in China. International Journal of Audiology. 48(5). 300–311. 22 indexed citations

Liew, Gerald, Tien Yin Wong, Paul Mitchell, et al.. (2007). Retinal Microvascular Abnormalities and Age-Related Hearing Loss: The Blue Mountains Hearing Study. Ear and Hearing. 28(3). 394–401. 38 indexed citations

Golding, Maryanne, et al.. (2007). Tympanometric and Acoustic Stapedius Reflex Measures in Older Adults: The Blue Mountains Hearing Study. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 18(5). 391–403. 18 indexed citations

Sharma, Mridula, Suzanne C. Purdy, Philip Newall, Kevin Wheldall, & Robyn Beaman. (2007). Refractory effects on auditory-evoked responses in children with reading disorders. Neuroreport. 18(2). 133–136. 12 indexed citations

Purdy, Suzanne C., et al.. (2006). The Use of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials to Evaluate Neural Encoding of Speech Sounds in Adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 17(8). 559–572. 43 indexed citations

Sharma, Mridula, Suzanne C. Purdy, Philip Newall, et al.. (2006). Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of auditory processing deficits in children with reading disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology. 117(5). 1130–1144. 99 indexed citations

10.

Cameron, Sharon, Harvey Dillon, & Philip Newall. (2005). The Listening in Spatialized Noise test: Normative data for children. International Journal of Audiology. 45(2). 99–108. 32 indexed citations

11.

Purdy, Suzanne C., et al.. (2005). Rising-frequency chirps and earphones with an extended high-frequency response enhance the post-auricular muscle response. International Journal of Audiology. 44(11). 631–636. 12 indexed citations

12.

Purdy, Suzanne C., et al.. (2004). Objective verification of infant speech perception using cortical auditory evoked potentials. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 1 indexed citations

13.

Sindhusake, Doungkamol, et al.. (2004). Factors Predicting Severity of Tinnitus: A Population-Based Assessment. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 15(4). 269–280. 85 indexed citations

14.

Sindhusake, Doungkamol, et al.. (2003). Risk Factors for Tinnitus in a Population of Older Adults: The Blue Mountains Hearing Study. Ear and Hearing. 24(6). 501–507. 116 indexed citations

15.

Sindhusake, Doungkamol, Paul Mitchell, Philip Newall, et al.. (2003). Prevalence and characteristics of tinnitus in older adults: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study: Prevalencia y características del acúfeno en adultos mayores: el Estudio de Audición Blue Mountains. International Journal of Audiology. 42(5). 289–294. 148 indexed citations

16.

Newall, Philip. (2001). Validation of self-reported hearing loss. International Journal of Epidemiology. 30(5). 1–8. 82 indexed citations

17.

Sindhusake, Doungkamol, Paul Mitchell, Wayne H. Smith, et al.. (2001). Validation of self-reported hearing loss. The Blue Mountains Hearing Study. International Journal of Epidemiology. 30(6). 1371–1378. 360 indexed citations

18.

Newall, Philip & Janine Oliver. (2000). Hearing Aid Optimization in the Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Candidacy. Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology. 57. 281–283. 1 indexed citations

19.

Tonkin, John, et al.. (1994). Testing for perilymphatic fistula based on Hennebert's sign and Tullio phenomenon. Australian Journal of Otolaryngology. 1(5). 422–425. 2 indexed citations

20.

Byrne, Denis, Aaron J. Parkinson, & Philip Newall. (1990). Hearing Aid Gain and Frequency Response Requirements for the Severely/Profoundly Hearing Impaired. Ear and Hearing. 11(1). 40–49. 145 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact